Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617949›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Enhanced lung cancer detection: Integrating improved random walker segmentation with artificial neural network and random forest classifier.

Sneha S Nair, V N Meena Devi, Saju Bhasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sneha S NairDepartment of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumarakovil, Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India.
V N Meena DeviDepartment of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumarakovil, Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India.
Saju BhasiDepartment of Radiation Physics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical image segmentation is a vital yet difficult job because of the multimodality of the acquired images. It is difficult to locate the polluted area before it spreads. Methods: This research makes use of several machine learning tools, including an artificial neural network as well as a random forest classifier, to increase the system's reliability of pulmonary nodule classification. Anisotropic diffusion filtering is initially used to remove noise from a picture. After that, a modified random walk method is used to get the region of interest inside the lung parenchyma. Finally, the features corresponding to the consistency of the picture segments are extracted using texture-based feature extraction for pulmonary nodules. The final stage is to identify and classify the pulmonary nodules using a classifier algorithm. Results: The studies employ cross-validation to demonstrate the validity of the diagnosis framework. In this instance, the proposed method is tested using CT scan information provided by the Lung Image Database Consortium. A random forest classifier showed 99.6 percent accuracy rate for detecting lung cancer, compared to a artificial neural network's 94.8 percent accuracy rate. Conclusions: Due to this, current research is now primarily concerned with identifying lung nodules and classifying them as benign or malignant. The diagnostic potential of machine learning as well as image processing approaches are enormous for the categorization of lung cancer.

Indexed as

AccuracyClassifierComputed tomographyDiagnosisLIDC datasetLung cancerRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID38617949
PMCPMC11015404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.