ArticleHeliyon2024
Application of bolus tracking: The effect of ROI positions on the images quality of cervicocerebral CT angiography.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of the Sequence of Computed Tomography Angiography and Perfusion in One-Stop-Shop CT Imaging for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Efficiency and Optimization of Iodinated Contrast Agents in Cerebral Aneurysm CT Angiography: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of "one-stop" coronary and head-and-neck computed tomography angiography with different scan sequences using a wide-detector system: heart-to-cranialQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Optimization of Bolus-Tracking Thresholds levels in Cerebral CT Angiography: Influence of Patient Characteristics on contrast enhancement dynamics and radiation dose metrics.F1000Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervicocerebral CT angiography (CTA) using the bolus tracking technique has been widely used for the assessment of cerebrovascular diseases. Regions of interest (ROI) can be placed in the descending aorta, ascending aorta, and the aortic arch. However, no study has compared the arteries and veins display when when the region of interest (ROI) is placed at different sites. In this study, we showed the impact of ROI positions on the image quality of cervicocerebral CTA. Methods: Two hundred and seventy patients who underwent cervicocerebral CTA with bolus tracking technique were randomly divided into three groups based on the position of the ROI placement: ascending aorta (Group 1, n = 90), aortic arch (Group 2, n = 90), and descending aorta (Group 3, n = 90). The scanning parameters and contrast agent injection protocols were consistent across all groups. Three observers independently assessed the objective image quality, while two observers jointly assessed the subjective image quality using a grade scale: poor (grade 1), average (grade 2), good (grade 3), and excellent (grade 4). The differences in intravascular CT values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), AVCR (arterial venous contrast ratio), and subjective image quality scores were compared among the three groups. Results: The CT values of the intracranial veins (superior sagittal sinus, ethmoid sinus and great cerebral vein) in group 1 were significantly lower than those in group 3 (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in CT values, SNR and CNR in the internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery among the three groups. The proportion of images with grade 4 was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 and 3 (41.1% vs 15.6% and 13.3%, p < 0.001). The proportion of images with grade 1 was significantly lower in group 1 than group 2 and 3 (1.1% vs 6.6% and 17.8%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ROI positions for cervicocerebral CTA did not affect the arterial image quality, but venous structures imaging was affected when the ROI was placed in the ascending aorta.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.