ArticleHeliyon2024
Thermal and solutal transport by Cattaneo-Christov model for the magnetohydrodynamic Williamson fluid with joule heating and heat source/sink.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article scrutinizes the 2-dimensional and boundary layer flow of magnetohydrodynamic Williamson fluid flowing on a stretchable surface with variable viscosity. The thermal and solutal rates are examined through the Cattaneo-Christov model with Joule heating, heat source/sink, and chemical reaction. The authors are motivated to conduct this study because of its practical and scientific significance in various processes, including polymer processing, textile industries, food industries, solar energy, biomedical science, wind turbine blades, oil spill clean-up, metal rolling, and forging. With the mentioned assumptions, the partial differential equations are achieved by using the basic governing laws, including momentum law, energy law, and concentration law. This non-linear system of equations is transmuted into ordinary differential equations by taking similarity transformations. The main novelty behind the conduction of this work is the numerical technique, namely the 'Adams-Milne (Predictor-Corrector)' method along with the Runge-Kutta technique on Matlab software, which has not previously been studied by any researcher in the literature. The analytical solution of the determined equations is not possible due to their highly non-linear nature; therefore the multistep numerical method namely the 'Adams-Milne (Predictor-Corrector)' method, along with the Runge-Kutta technique is used to determine the numerical results. The outcomes are noted due to numerous parameters for velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles. The explanation of graphical and numerical results is discussed here. The graphical impression of the Williamson parameter reveals that the velocity and temperature curves diminish for higher inputs of this parameter. The movement of fluid shows the declining behavior for the Hartmann number and viscosity parameter. The solutal and thermal findings due to Cattaneo-Christov heat and mass relaxation coefficients mark the reducing behaviour in respective field. The rise in reaction coefficient decreases the mass distribution. The analyses of comparison of results are also presented here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.