Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617901›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. A2024

Emission Ghost Imaging: reconstruction with data augmentation.

K J Coakley, H H Chen-Mayer, B Ravel, D Josell, N N Klimov, D S Hussey, S M Robinson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K J CoakleyNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305 USA.
H H Chen-MayerNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
B RavelNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
D JosellNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
N N KlimovNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
D S HusseyNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
S M RobinsonPREP Associate, Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ghost Imaging enables 2D reconstruction of an object even though particles transmitted or emitted by the object of interest are detected with a single pixel detector without spatial resolution. This is possible because for the particular implementation of ghost imaging presented here, the incident beam is spatially modulated with a non-configurable attenuating mask whose orientation is varied (e.g. via transverse displacement or rotation) in the course of the ghost imaging experiment. Each orientation yields a distinct spatial pattern in the attenuated beam. In many cases, ghost imaging reconstructions can be dramatically improved by factoring the measurement matrix which consists of measured attenuated incident radiation for each of many orientations of the mask at each pixel to be reconstructed as the product of an orthonormal matrix

Identifiers

PMID38617901
PMCPMC11011244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.