Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617899›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Data-driven determination of zooplankton bioregions and robustness analysis.

Patrick R Pata, Moira Galbraith, Kelly Young, Andrew R Margolin, R Ian Perry, Brian P V Hunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrick R PataInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
Moira GalbraithInstitute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Sidney, B.C., Canada.
Kelly YoungInstitute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Sidney, B.C., Canada.
Andrew R MargolinInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
R Ian PerryInstitute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Sidney, B.C., Canada.
Brian P V HuntInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying biogeographic regions through cluster analysis of species distribution data is a common method for partitioning ecosystems. Selecting the appropriate cluster analysis method requires a comparison of multiple algorithms. In this study, we demonstrate a data-driven process to select a method for bioregionalization based on community data and test its robustness to data variability following these steps: •We aggregated and curated zooplankton community observations from expeditions in the Northeast Pacific.•We determined the best bioregionalization approach by comparing nine cluster analysis methods using ten goodness of clustering indices.•We evaluated the robustness of the bioregionalization to different sources of sampling and taxonomic variability by comparing the bioregionalization of the overall dataset with bioregionalizations of subsets of the data. The K-means clustering of the log-chord transformed abundance was selected as the optimal method for bioregionalization of the zooplankton dataset. This clustering resulted in the emergence of four bioregions along the cross-shelf gradient: the Offshore, Deep Shelf, Nearshore, and Deep Fjord bioregions. The robustness analyses demonstrated that the bioregionalization was consistent despite variability in the spatial and temporal frequency of sampling, sampling methodology, and taxonomic coverage.

Indexed as

Cluster analysisData curationOcean partitioningPlankton community dataRegionalizationSampling method variabilitySelection of the optimal cluster analysis method for regionalizing zooplankton community data and robustness testsSpecies distributionsTaxonomic variability

Identifiers

PMID38617899
PMCPMC11015493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.