ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Deep learning of pretreatment multiphase CT images for predicting response to lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Response evaluation to systemic therapy in HCC: Current challenges and future perspectives.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Review
- Deep learning techniques for using computed tomography imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Review
- Multiphasic CT-based multimodal deep learning model for predicting early hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following liver transplantation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: emerging combinations and biomarker challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Explainable artificial intelligence and ensemble learning for hepatocellular carcinoma classification: State of the art, performance, and clinical implications.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Radiology-based artificial intelligence for predicting targeted therapy response in pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- A multimodal fusion system predicting survival benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Predicting Immunotherapy Response in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models and Human Experts.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Enhancing surgical object detection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with explicit positional relationship modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Combination therapy of lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CLICI) has emerged as a promising approach for managing unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the response to such treatment is observed in only a subset of patients, underscoring the pressing need for reliable methods to identify potential responders. Materials & methods: This was a retrospective analysis involving 120 patients with unresectable HCC. They were divided into training (n = 72) and validation (n = 48) cohorts. We developed an interpretable deep learning model using multiphase computed tomography (CT) images to predict whether patients will respond or not to CLICI treatment, based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). We evaluated the models' performance and analyzed the impact of each CT phase. Critical regions influencing predictions were identified and visualized through heatmaps. Results: The multiphase model outperformed the best biphase and uniphase models, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.802 (95% CI = 0.780-0.824). The portal phase images were found to significantly enhance the model's predictive accuracy. Heatmaps identified six critical features influencing treatment response, offering valuable insights to clinicians. Additionally, we have made this model accessible via a web server at http://uhccnet.com/ for ease of use. Conclusions: The integration of multiphase CT images with deep learning-generated heatmaps for predicting treatment response provides a robust and practical tool for guiding CLICI therapy in patients with unresectable HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.