Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617816›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2024

A National Snapshot of Introductory Chemistry Instructors and Their Instructional Practices.

Ying Wang, Naneh Apkarian, Melissa H Dancy, Charles Henderson, Estrella Johnson, Jeffrey R Raker, Marilyne Stains

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cultivating Enduring Changes in Assessment Through a Life Sciences Community of Practice.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying WangDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4319, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0570-9639
Naneh ApkarianSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1804, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-8633
Melissa H DancyThe Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008-5252, United States.
Charles HendersonDepartment of Physics and Mallinson Institute for Science Education, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008-5252, United States.
Estrella JohnsonDepartment of Mathematics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0123, United States.
Jeffrey R RakerDepartment of Chemistry, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620-5250, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-6095
Marilyne StainsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4319, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7881-5718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of active learning on promoting students' academic outcomes and persistence has been established in the literature. However, despite the effort of purposeful change agents, the uptake of active learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is slow. While previous research from the chemistry education community has provided insights into the implementation of specific active learning strategies across the United States, the extent to which chemistry instructors leverage these strategies in general remains unknown. This article presents the results of a national survey aimed at exploring introductory chemistry instructors' knowledge and implementation of active learning, variations on this knowledge, and use across tenure statuses and institution types. This paper also aims to address the gap in the literature in our understanding of the characteristics of instructors of these courses. We thus provide a description of instructors' demographics, training, teaching experience, and teaching responsibilities. Our findings reveal that instructors in these courses are prominently males of European descent. Additionally, instructors come into their teaching position with minimal pedagogical training and participate mainly in short training once in their position. While the majority of instructors have knowledge of specific active learning strategies, their consistent implementation remains limited, with lecturing still being the instructional practice of choice. Variations were found between institution types and across tenure statuses within institutions in terms of pedagogical training, use of specific active learning strategies, and proportion of class time spent lecturing. The findings provide a baseline for future studies that aim to assess the effectiveness of interventions fostering the implementation of active learning in introductory chemistry courses and highlight the critical need for improved communication about teaching practices across institutions and tenure statuses.

Identifiers

PMID38617816
PMCPMC11008091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.