Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617789›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024

Recommended approaches for screening and early detection of lung cancer in the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region: a consensus statement.

Ahmed Allehebi, Ameen Al-Omair, Bassam Mahboub, Coenraad F Koegelenberg, Mohsen Mokhtar, Ashraf Mokhtar Madkour, Khaled Al-Asad, Ugur Selek, Humaid O Al-Shamsi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms at the Arg399Gln Locus of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Ahmed AllehebiDepartment of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ameen Al-OmairDepartment of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Bassam MahboubDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Dubai Health Authority Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Coenraad F KoegelenbergDivsion of Pulmonology, Stellenbosch University & Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mohsen MokhtarAl-Kasr Al-Aini School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ashraf Mokhtar MadkourAin Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Khaled Al-AsadUniversity of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Ugur SelekKoc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Humaid O Al-ShamsiDepartment of Oncology, Burjeel Cancer Institute, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Ain Shams University · EGGulf Medical University · AEKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKoç University · TRUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of lung cancer in the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region has steadily increased in recent years and is generally associated with a poor prognosis due to the late detection of most of the cases. We explored the factors leading to delayed diagnoses, as well as the challenges and gaps in the early screening, detection, and referral framework for lung cancer in the MEA. Methods: A steering committee meeting was convened in October 2022, attended by a panel of ten key external experts in the field of oncology from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey, who critically and extensively analyzed the current unmet needs and challenges in the screening and early diagnosis of lung cancer in the region. Results: As per the experts' opinion, lack of awareness about disease symptoms, misdiagnosis, limited screening initiatives, and late referral to specialists were the primary reasons for delayed diagnoses emphasizing the need for national-level lung cancer screening programs in the MEA region. Screening guidelines recommend low-dose computerized tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening in patients with a high risk of malignancy. However, high cost and lack of awareness among the public as well as healthcare providers prevented the judicious use of LDCT in the MEA region. Well-established screening and referral guidelines were available in only a few of the MEA countries and needed to be implemented in others to identify suspected cases early and provide timely intervention thus improving patient outcomes. Conclusions: There is a great need for large-scale screening programs, preferably integrated with tobacco-control programs and awareness programs for physicians and patients, which may facilitate higher adherence to lung cancer screening and improve survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Consensuslow-dose computerized tomography (LDCT)lung cancerMiddle East and Africa (MEA)screening

Identifiers

PMID38617789
PMCPMC11009596
OpenAlexW4393050437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.