Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617786›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024

Beyond diagnosis: a narrative review of the evolving therapeutic role of medical thoracoscopy in the management of pleural diseases.

Alberto Fantin, Nadia Castaldo, Michelangelo Schwartzbaum Palou, Giovanni Viterale, Ernesto Crisafulli, Giulia Sartori, Filippo Patrucco, Paolo Vailati, Giuseppe Morana, Federico Mei and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of thoracic disease · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto FantinDepartment of Pulmonology, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-775X
Nadia CastaldoDepartment of Pulmonology, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Michelangelo Schwartzbaum PalouDepartment of Medicine, Respiratory Medicine Unit, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni ViteraleDepartment of Medicine, Respiratory Medicine Unit, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ernesto CrisafulliDepartment of Medicine, Respiratory Medicine Unit, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giulia SartoriDepartment of Medicine, Respiratory Medicine Unit, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Filippo PatruccoRespiratory Diseases Unit, Medical Department, AOU Maggiore della Carità di Novara, Novara, Italy.
Paolo VailatiDepartment of Pulmonology, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Giuseppe MoranaDepartment of Pulmonology, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Federico MeiPulmonary Diseases Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Lina ZuccatostaPulmonary Diseases Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Vincenzo PatrunoDepartment of Pulmonology, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITUniversity of Verona · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Medical thoracoscopy (MT) is an endoscopic technique performed by interventional pulmonologists with a favorable safety profile and few contraindications, providing diagnostic and therapeutic intervention in a single sitting. This narrative review was designed to summarize the therapeutic role of MT based on the latest results from the available literature. Methods: Pertinent literature published in English, relative to human studies, between 2010-2022 was searched in Medline/PubMed and Cochrane databases. Publications regarded as relevant were considered for inclusion in this review; additional references were added based on the authors' knowledge and judgment. The review considered population studies, meta-analyses, case series, and case reports. Key Content and Findings: MT has mostly been described and is currently used globally in the diagnostic approach to exudative pleural effusion of undetermined origin. Carefully evaluating the literature, it is clear that there is initial evidence to support the use of MT in the therapeutic approach of malignant pleural effusion, pneumothorax, empyema, and less frequently hemothorax and foreign body retrieval. Conclusions: MT is an effective procedure for treating the clinical entities presented in this document; it must be carried out in selected patients, managed in centers with high procedural expertise. Further evidence is needed to assess the optimal indications and appropriate patients' profiles for therapeutic MT. The endpoints of length of hospital stay, surgical referral, complications and mortality will have to be considered in future studies to validate it as a therapeutic intervention to be applied globally.

Indexed as

empyemapneumothoraxpoudragetalcThoracoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38617786
PMCPMC11009601
OpenAlexW4393267607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.