Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617784›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Perioperative intravenous lidocaine in thoracoscopic surgery for improved postoperative pain control: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, superiority trial.

Aljaz Hojski, Daniel Bolliger, Makhmudbek Mallaev, Sandrine Dackam, Nikolay Tsvetkov, Mark Wiese, Tobias Schneider, Andreas Lampart, Didier Lardinois

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03677817 (Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Superiority Trial, Evaluating the Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine on Postoperative Opioid Consumption, Pain Ratings, Duration of Hospital Stay, Time to First Defecation, 30-day Mortality and Development of Chronic Pain in Patients Undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Procedures), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03677817 phase3completednot on this map

Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Superiority Trial, Evaluating the Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine on Postoperative Opioid Consumption, Pain Ratings, Duration of Hospital Stay, Time to First Defecation, 30-day Mortality and Development of Chronic Pain in Patients Undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2019 to 2022Enrolled113ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsLidocaine, NaCl 0,9%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The efficacy of loco-regional ropivacaine analgesia via intercostal catheters after lung resection: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority study.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aljaz HojskiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel BolligerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Makhmudbek MallaevDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sandrine DackamDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Nikolay TsvetkovDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Mark WieseDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tobias SchneiderDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas LampartDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Didier LardinoisDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pain, including associated pain management, remains a burden on patients after thoracic surgery. Our objective was to investigate whether perioperative intravenous administration of lidocaine reduces postoperative morphine consumption and pain intensity after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled superiority trial, patients undergoing VATS with a planned duration of ≤90 minutes were randomized within an intention-to-treat setting. Patients received either intravenous lidocaine or placebo as a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg 30 minutes before incision, followed by a continuous infusion of 3.0 mg/kg/hour until 2 hours after skin closure. Pain and morphine consumption were evaluated when resting and when coughing 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours after skin closure and in a follow-up 14, 90, and 180 days postoperatively. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in the lidocaine group, 24 in the placebo group. Patients' characteristics and preoperative pain scores were similar in both groups. When coughing, patients of the lidocaine group had less pain within 24 hours after skin closure than the placebo group (4.60±1.64 Conclusions: Our results suggest that perioperative intravenous lidocaine administration reduces pain scores after VATS. The beneficial clinical effects are limited. Nevertheless, intravenous lidocaine may be helpful as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol or with patients in whom the use of other analgesics is contraindicated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03677817.

Indexed as

multimodal analgesiaPerioperative lidocainepostoperative painvideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID38617784
PMCPMC11009578
OpenAlexW4393281292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.