Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617738›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2024

Endoscopic treatment of scarred polyps with a non-thermal device (Endorotor): A review of the literature‎.

Mariam Zaghloul, Hameed Rehman, Stefano Sansone, Konstantinos Argyriou, Adolfo Parra-Blanco

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mariam ZaghloulDepartment of Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, Kafrelsheikh Universit, Kafr-Elshikh 33516, Egypt.
Hameed RehmanDepartment of Gastroenterology Service, Nottingham City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, United Kingdom.
Stefano SansoneDepartment of Gastroenterology Service, Nottingham City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, United Kingdom.
Konstantinos ArgyriouDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41334, Greece.
Adolfo Parra-BlancoDepartment of Gastroenterology Service, Nottingham City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, United Kingdom.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBKafrelsheikh University · EGUniversity Hospital of Larissa · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic resection (ER) of colorectal polyps has become a daily practice in most endoscopic units providing a colorectal cancer screening program and requires the availability of local experts and high-end endoscopic devices. ER procedures have evolved over the past few years from endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to more advanced techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and endo-scopic full-thickness resection. Complete resection and disease eradication are the ultimate goals of ER-based techniques, and novel devices have been developed to achieve these goals. The EndoRotor

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsEndometriosisCicatrixDisease EradicationEndoscopyFemaleHumansColorectal cancerColorectal polypsEndoRotorRecurrent polypsScarred polyps

Identifiers

PMID38617738
PMCPMC11008378
OpenAlexW4393273217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.