ArticleACS omega2024
Prediction and Interpretability of Melting Points of Ionic Liquids Using Graph Neural Networks.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LG-Transformer: learned-graph transformer framework enabling diverse physicochemical properties prediction toward fuel design.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Beyond the Solvent: Engineering Ionic Liquids for Biomedical Applications-Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ionic liquids (ILs) have wide and promising applications in fields such as chemical engineering, energy, and the environment. However, the melting points (MPs) of ILs are one of the most crucial properties affecting their applications. The MPs of ILs are affected by various factors, and tuning these in a laboratory is time-consuming and costly. Therefore, an accurate and efficient method is required to predict the desired MPs in the design of novel targeted ILs. In this study, three descriptor-based machine learning (DBML) models and eight graph neural network (GNN) models were proposed to predict the MPs of ILs. Fingerprints and molecular graphs were used to represent molecules for the DBML and GNNs, respectively. The GNN models demonstrated performance superior to that of the DBML models. Among all of the examined models, the graph convolutional model exhibited the best performance with high accuracy (root-mean-squared error = 37.06, mean absolute error = 28.79, and correlation coefficient = 0.76). Benefiting from molecular graph representation, we built a GNN-based interpretable model to reveal the atomistic contribution to the MPs of ILs using a data-driven procedure. According to our interpretable model, amino groups, S
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.