ArticleACS omega2024
Integrating Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Precision Screening of Anticancer Peptides: A Novel Approach for Efficient Drug Discovery.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-driven anticancer peptide discovery.iMetaOmics · 2025Review
- A scalable reinforcement learning approach for screening large peptide libraries for bioactive peptide discovery.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Reducing Measurement Costs of Thermal Power: An Advanced MISM (Mamba with Improved SSM Embedding in MLP) Regression Model for Accurate COSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid and effective identification of anticancer peptides (ACPs) by computer technology provides a new perspective for cancer treatment. In the identification process of ACPs, accurate sequence encoding and effective classification models are crucial for predicting their biological activity. Traditional machine learning methods have been widely applied in sequence analysis, but deep learning provides a new approach to capture sequence complexity. In this study, a two-stage ACPs classification model was innovatively proposed. Three novel coding strategies were explored; two mainstream Natural Language Processing (NLP) models and 11 machine learning models were fused to identify ACPs, which significantly improved the prediction accuracy of ACPs. We analyzed the correlation between peptide chain amino acids and evaluated the relevant performance of the model by the ROC curve and t-SNE dimensionality reduction technique. The results indicated that the deep learning and machine learning fusion models of M3E-base and KNeighborsDist models, especially when considering the semantic information on amino acid sequences, achieved the highest average accuracy (AvgAcc) of 0.939, with an AUC value as high as 0.97. Then, in vitro cell experiments were used to verify that the two ACPs predicted by the model had antitumor efficacy. This study provides a convenient and effective method for screening ACPs. With further optimization and testing, these strategies have the potential to play an important role in drug discovery and design.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.