Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617599›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2024

A phase Ib/II trial of capmatinib plus spartalizumab

Armando Santoro, Eric Assenat, Thomas Yau, Jean-Pierre Delord, Michela Maur, Jennifer Knox, Stephane Cattan, Kyung-Hun Lee, Gianluca Del Conte, Christoph Springfeld and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02795429 (A Phase Ib/II, Open-label, Multi-center Study of INC280 in Combination With PDR001 or PDR001 Single Agent in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02795429 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase Ib/II, Open-label, Multi-center Study of INC280 in Combination With PDR001 or PDR001 Single Agent in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2016 to 2021Enrolled89ConditionsAdvanced Hepatocellular CarcinomaArmsSpartalizumab, Capmatinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Armando SantoroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele - Milan, Italy.
Eric AssenatHopital Arnaud de Villeneuve Montpellier Cedex 5, Herault, France.
Thomas YauDepartment of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Jean-Pierre DelordInstitut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Michela MaurOncology Unit, AOU Policlinico Modena and University Study of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Jennifer KnoxPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephane CattanCHRU de Lille-Hospital Claude Huriez, Lille Cedex, France.
Kyung-Hun LeeSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Gianluca Del ConteDepartment of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Christoph SpringfeldNat. Centrum f. Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elisa LeoNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexandros XyrafasNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Lauren FairchildOncology Data Science, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, USA.
Feby MardjuadiNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Stephen L ChanState Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRChinese University of Hong Kong · HKHeidelberg University · DEHôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve · FRHumanitas University · ITInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRNovartis (China) · CNPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAQueen Mary Hospital · CNSeoul National University Hospital · KRUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & aims: This phase Ib/II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of capmatinib in combination with spartalizumab or spartalizumab alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Eligible patients who had progressed or were intolerant to sorafenib received escalating doses of capmatinib 200 mg, 300 mg, and 400 mg twice a day (bid) plus spartalizumab 300 mg every 3 weeks (q3w) in the phase Ib study. Once the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was determined, the phase II study commenced with randomised 1:1 treatment with either capmatinib + spartalizumab (n = 32) or spartalizumab alone (n = 30). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability (phase Ib) and investigator-assessed overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 for combination Results: In phase Ib, the RP2D for capmatinib in combination with spartalizumab was determined to be 400 mg bid. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 diarrhoea was reported in one patient at the capmatinib 400 mg bid + spartalizumab 300 mg q3w dose level. The primary endpoint in the phase II study was not met. The observed overall response rate in the capmatinib + spartalizumab arm was 9.4% Conclusion: Capmatinib at 400 mg bid plus spartalizumab 300 mg q3w was established as the RP2D, with manageable toxicities and no significant safety signals, but the combination did not show superior clinical activity compared with spartalizumab single-agent treatment in patients with advanced HCC who had previously been treated with sorafenib. Impact and implications: Simultaneous targeting of MET and programmed cell death protein 1 may provide synergistic clinical benefit in patients with advanced HCC. This is the first trial to report a combination of capmatinib (MET inhibitor) and spartalizumab (programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) as second-line treatment after sorafenib for advanced HCC. The combination did not show superior clinical activity compared with spartalizumab single-agent treatment in patients with advanced HCC who had previously been treated with sorafenib. The results indicate that there is a clear need to identify a reliable predictive marker of response for HCC and to identify patients with HCC that would benefit from the combination of checkpoint inhibitor +/- targeted therapy. Clinical trial number: NCT02795429.

Indexed as

anti-programmed death-ligand 1CapmatinibHepatocellular carcinomaMETSpartalizumab

Identifiers

PMID38617599
PMCPMC11009449
OpenAlexW4391293858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.