Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617581›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2024

Percutaneous vs Open Zadek Osteotomy for Treatment of Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy and Haglund's Deformity: A Systematic Review.

Yianni Bakaes, SarahRose Hall, J Benjamin Jackson, A Holly Johnson, Oliver N Schipper, Ettore Vulcano, Jonathan R M Kaplan, Tyler A Gonzalez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Beyond the bunion: Trends in minimally invasive techniques in foot and ankle surgery.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yianni BakaesSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
SarahRose HallSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-3118
J Benjamin JacksonSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9444-087X
A Holly JohnsonHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Oliver N SchipperAnderson Orthopaedic Clinic, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1248-640X
Ettore VulcanoColumbia University Division of Orthopedics at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
Jonathan R M KaplanDuke Orthopaedic Surgery, Morrisville, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0821-7939
Tyler A GonzalezSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3210-8097
Prisma Health · USUniversity of South Carolina · USAnderson Orthopaedic Clinic · USHospital for Special Surgery · USMount Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous Zadek osteotomy (ZO) has emerged as a surgical treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) over the last decade. Existing literature is limited regarding the comparison of this approach with the more established, open ZO technique. This systematic review aims to evaluate and compare the current data on open vs percutaneous ZO approaches to help set evidence-based guidelines. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the keywords (Zadek osteotomy) OR (Keck and Kelly osteotomy) OR (dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy) OR (Haglund Deformity) OR (Haglund Syndrome) OR (Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy) and MeSH terms Results: A total of 17 studies were reviewed, including 611 subjects and 625 ZO procedures. Of these procedures, 81 (11%) subjects had a percutaneous and 544 (89%) subjects had an open ZO. The mean follow-up time was 16.1 months for patients treated with percutaneous ZO and 36.1 months for patients treated with open ZO. Both open and percutaneous studies included in this review showed postoperative improvements in AOFAS, FFI, VISA-A, and VAS scores in patients with IAT. The reported complication rate was 5.8% among patients treated with percutaneous ZO and 10.2% among patients treated with open ZO. Conclusion: Percutaneous ZO is an emerging approach with substantially fewer documented cases compared with the open ZO. Both percutaneous and open ZO appear to be relatively effective treatments for insertional Achilles tendinopathy with Haglund's deformity. The lower complication rates reported for percutaneous ZO is encouraging. Further investigation with more subjects undergoing percutaneous ZO is clearly needed.

Indexed as

Haglund’s deformityinsertional Achilles tendinopathyminimally invasive surgeryMISpercutaneoussystematic reviewZadek osteotomy

Identifiers

PMID38617581
PMCPMC11015789
OpenAlexW4394764757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.