ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024
Operational Impact of Neurology Rural Access Model: Reflections on the Importance of Demand-Shaping.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies for Improving Access in Academic Neurology.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Demand for specialty neurologic care has been steadily increasing over the past several decades, and health systems are needing to meet the demands of their patients while managing a dwindling workforce. This retrospective study investigates the operational impact of a regional neurology clinic staffed by advanced practice providers with remote physician oversight in a "hub and spoke" delivery model to serve lower complexity patients. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate outcomes. Descriptive analysis of referral volumes, cancellation/no-show rates, and patient complexity as determined by the reason for referral were used to evaluate patients who received referrals from rural counties north of the primary neurology practice before and after the opening of the regional clinic. These metrics were evaluated longitudinally from counties of interest and for differences in patients seen at the regional clinic vs primary neurology practice. Results: Referral volumes from the northern counties increased at significantly higher rates after the opening of the regional clinic than other counties in the serviced area. This resulted in an increase in patients seen in the hub clinics and spoke clinic. The regional clinic did see patients who were less complex than the primary practice; however, the total volume of low-complexity patients scheduled at the primary practice did not decrease. Cancellation and no-show rates did not seem to be affected in either clinic. Discussion: The opening of a regional "spoke" clinic resulted in the generation of greater referral volumes that exceeded the capacity created by the clinic. Owing to this, there was an increase in the number of patients seen from the regional counties in the hub clinics, negating the potential benefit of improving access for high-complexity patients. Importance of demand-shaping and appropriate utilization as part of the value equation are discussed, followed by discussion of mitigation strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.