ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
Gastric cancer prognosis: unveiling autophagy-related signatures and immune infiltrates.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-algorithm machine learning combined with in silico gene knockout reveals the diagnostic value and functional regulatory networks of ferroptosis-related genes in gastric cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Sorting nexin 9 expression and prognostic implications in lung adenocarcinoma: integrative bioinformatic andTranslational cancer research · 2025Article
- Single-cell sequencing reveals the role ofiMeta · 2025Article
- A prognostic model based on autophagy-and senescence-related genes for gastric cancer: implications for immunotherapy and personalized treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics-based prognostic value andFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Causal relationship between circulating immune cells and gastric cancer: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis using UK Biobank and FinnGen datasets.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autophagy played a crucial regulatory role in tumor initiation and progression. Therefore, we aimed to comprehensively analyze autophagy-related genes (ARGs) in gastric cancer, focusing on their expression, prognostic value, and potential functions. Methods: The gastric cancer gene chip datasets (GSE79973 and GSE54129) were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Subsequently, the Limma package was employed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the normal and disease groups. The selected ARGs were further authenticated using the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, and GSE19826 database. Results: A total of 15 autophagy-related DEGs, eight of which were upregulated [ Conclusions: We conjectured that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.