Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617367›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Non-invasive neuromodulation of cerebello-hippocampal volume-behavior relationships.

Thamires N C Magalhães, Ted Maldonado, T Bryan Jackson, Tracey H Hicks, Ivan A Herrejon, Thiago J R Rezende, Abigail C Symm, Jessica A Bernard

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thamires N C MagalhãesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Ted MaldonadoDepartment of Psychology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, United States of America.
T Bryan JacksonVanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer's Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Tracey H HicksDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Ivan A HerrejonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Thiago J R RezendeDepartment of Neurology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Abigail C SymmDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Jessica A BernardDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Texas A&M University · USIndiana State University · USUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRVanderbilt Health · US

Funding

A longitudinal investigation of the cerebellum in adulthood: anatomical and network changes, motor function, and cognitionR01AG064010 · NIA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, JESSICA ANN · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study here explores the link between transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and brain-behavior relationships. We propose that tDCS may indirectly influence the complex relationships between brain volume and behavior. We focused on the dynamics between the hippocampus (HPC) and cerebellum (CB) in cognitive processes, a relationship with significant implications for understanding memory and motor skills. Seventy-four young adults (mean age: 22±0.42 years, mean education: 14.7±0.25 years) were randomly assigned to receive either anodal, cathodal, or sham stimulation. Following stimulation, participants completed computerized tasks assessing working memory and sequence learning in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment. We investigated the statistical interaction between CB and HPC volumes. Our findings showed that individuals with larger cerebellar volumes had shorter reaction times (RT) on a high-load working memory task in the sham stimulation group. In contrast, the anodal stimulation group exhibited faster RTs during the low-load working memory condition. These RT differences were associated with the cortical volumetric interaction between CB-HPC. Literature suggests that anodal stimulation down-regulates the CB and here, those with larger volumes perform more quickly, suggesting the potential need for additional cognitive resources to compensate for cerebellar downregulation. This new insight suggests that tDCS can aid in revealing structure-function relationships, due to greater performance variability, especially in young adults. It may also reveal new targets of interest in the study of aging or in diseases where there is also greater behavioral variability.

Indexed as

brain-behaviorcerebellumcognitive processcortical volumetric interactiontranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Identifiers

PMID38617367
PMCPMC11014496
OpenAlexW4393996760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.