Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617326›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Genomic adaptation in group B

Macy E Pell, Heather M Blankenship, Jennifer A Gaddy, H Dele Davies, Shannon D Manning

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Macy E PellMichigan State University, Department of Microbiology, Genetics, and Immunology (MGI), E. Lansing, MI.
Heather M BlankenshipMichigan Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau of Laboratories, Division of Infectious Diseases, Lansing, MI.
Jennifer A GaddyDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
H Dele DaviesUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Shannon D ManningMichigan State University, Department of Microbiology, Genetics, and Immunology (MGI), E. Lansing, MI.ORCID 0000-0001-9581-0660
Michigan State University · USMichigan Department of Health and Human Services · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Determining the contribution of zinc deficiency to perinatal Group B Streptococcus infectionsR01HD090061 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ARONOFF, DAVID M, GADDY, JENNIFER A · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
The Role of macrophages in chorioamnionitis and group B streptococcal infectionsR01AI134036 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ARONOFF, DAVID M · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Toxicant Exposure Impacts Host-pathogen interactions within the Reproductive TractI01BX005352 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI GADDY, JENNIFER A · 2021 to 2024
–
ACL HHS U01CK000510BLRD VA I01 BX005352NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000510NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI134036NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through vaginal colonization, GBS causes severe outcomes including neonatal sepsis and meningitis. Although intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) has reduced neonatal disease rates, persistent GBS colonization has been observed in patients following prophylaxis. To determine whether IAP selects for genomic signatures that enhance GBS survival and persistence, a pangenome analysis was performed on 97 isolates from 58 participants before (prenatal) and after (postpartum) IAP/childbirth. Thirty-one of the 34 paired strains from participants with persistent colonization clustered together in the core gene phylogeny, suggesting that the strains recovered at the postpartum sampling were highly similar to those recovered at the prenatal visit. A core-gene mutation analysis identified mutations in 74% (n=23) of the 31 postpartum genomes when compared to the prenatal strains of the same multilocus sequence type recovered from the same individuals. Several strains had acquired mutations in the same colonization-associated genes, though two postpartum strains accounted for most of the mutations. These two outliers were classified as mutators based on high mutation rates and mutations within DNA repair system genes. Increased biofilm production was observed in half of the postpartum strains relative to the prenatal strains, which is supported by the presence of point mutations in genes associated with adherence. Together, these findings suggest that antibiotics may impose a selective pressure on GBS that selects for mutations and phenotypes that promote adaptation and survival

Identifiers

PMID38617326
PMCPMC11014637
OpenAlexW4393403740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.