Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617169›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Luo-Dan Qian, Zi-Ang Zhou, Si-Qi Li, Jun Liu, Shu-Xin Zhang, Jia-Liang Ren, Wei Wang, Jigang Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Article
  3. A multiparameter diagnostic model based on 2-[Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luo-Dan QianDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zi-Ang ZhouNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Si-Qi LiNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jun LiuNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shu-Xin ZhangNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jia-Liang RenDepartment of Pharmaceuticals Diagnostics, GE HealthCare, Beijing, China.
Wei WangNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jigang YangNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The MYCN copy number category is closely related to the prognosis of neuroblastoma (NB). Therefore, this study aimed to assess the predictive ability of Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 104 pediatric patients with NB that had been confirmed by pathology. To develop the Bio-omics model (B-model), which incorporated clinical and biological aspects, PET/CT radiographic features, PET quantitative parameters, and significant features with multivariable stepwise logistic regression were preserved. Important radiomics features were identified through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and univariable analysis. On the basis of radiomics features obtained from PET and CT scans, the radiomics model (R-model) was developed. The significant bio-omics and radiomics features were combined to establish a Multi-omics model (M-model). The above 3 models were established to differentiate MYCN wild from MYCN gain and MYCN amplification (MNA). The calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to verify the prediction performance. Post hoc analysis was conducted to compare whether the constructed M-model can distinguish MYCN gain from MNA. Results: The M-model showed excellent predictive performance in differentiating MYCN wild from MYCN gain and MNA, which was better than that of the B-model and R-model [area under the curve (AUC) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.92 Conclusions: The M-model model based on bio-omics and radiomics features is an effective tool to distinguish MYCN copy number category in pediatric patients with NB.

Indexed as

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT)MYCNNeuroblastoma (NB)radiogenomics

Identifiers

PMID38617169
PMCPMC11007507
OpenAlexW4393312691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.