The application value of a vendor-specific deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in "triple low" head and neck computed tomography angiography.

Background: Head and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA) technology has become the noninvasive imaging method of choice for the diagnosis and long-term follow-up of vascular lesions of the head and neck. However, issues of radiation safety and contrast nephropathy associated with CTA examinations remain concerns. In recent years, deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithms have been increasingly used in clinical studies, demonstrating their potential for dose optimization. This study aimed to investigate the value of using a DLIR algorithm to reduce radiation and contrast doses in head and neck CTA. Methods: A total of 100 patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. Group A (50 patients) consisted of those who underwent 70-kVp CTA with a low contrast volume and injection rate and who were classified according to the reconstruction algorithm into subgroups A1 [DLIR at high weighting (DLIR-H)], A2 [DLIR at low weighting (DLIR-L)], and A3 [volume-based adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction with 50% weighting (ASIR-V50%)]. Meanwhile, group B (50 patients) consisted of those who underwent standard radiation and contrast doses at 100 kVp with ASIR-V50% reconstruction. The computed tomography (CT) attenuation, background noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective image quality score (SIQS) were statistically compared for several vessels among the four groups. Results: Group A showed significant reductions in contrast dosage, injection rate, and radiation dose of 36.09%, 20.88%, and 47.80%, respectively, compared to group B (all P<0.001). The four groups differed significantly in terms of background noise (all P<0.05) with group A1 having the lowest value. Group A1 also had significantly higher SNR and CNR values compared to group B in all vessels (all P<0.05) except the M1 of the middle cerebral artery for the SNR. Group A1 also had the highest SIQS, followed by the A2, B, and A3 groups. The SIQS showed good agreement between the two reviewers in all groups, with κ values between 0.88 and 1. Conclusions: Compared to the standard-dose protocol using 100 kVp and ASIR-V50%, a protocol of 70 kVp combined with DLIR-H significantly reduces the radiation dose, contrast dose, and injection rate in head and neck CTA while still significantly improving image quality for patients with a standard body size.