ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Clinical application of the retrograde track method in reopening dysfunctional biliary stents.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biliary stent dysfunction is challenging to treat in clinic. The retrograde track method (RTM) has a promising clinical application in the reopening of dysfunctional biliary stents. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of the RTM in reopening dysfunctional biliary stents. Methods: From February 2013 to January 2020, 151 patients underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary interventional procedures for reopening dysfunctional biliary stents at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, and 25 patients (12 females, 13 males; mean age 63.12 years old) underwent the RTM after anterograde reopening dysfunction biliary stent failure. Technical success, clinical success, irradiation dose, procedure time, complications, and overall survival (OS) were recorded, and levels of total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin (ALB), and carbohydrate antigen-199 (CA-199) were compared before treatment and 1 month after treatment. Results: The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 96%, respectively, and the irradiation dose and procedure times were 774.07±330.80 mGy and 45.16±9.48 min, respectively. Two patients (8%) experienced major complications. The median OS was 10.73 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.37-12.09]. Compared with pretreatment values, the mean levels at 1 month after RTM administration for TBIL (189.47±59.20 Conclusions: RTM is an effective alternative treatment method when anterograde reopening of a dysfunctional biliary stent occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.