Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617134›Full record

ArticleFood quality and preference2024

Distinct Sensory Hedonic Functions for Sourness in Adults.

Sara Spinelli, Helene Hopfer, Victor Moulinier, John Prescott, Erminio Monteleone, John E Hayes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food quality and preference, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara SpinelliDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, Italy.
Helene HopferSensory Evaluation Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Victor MoulinierSensory Evaluation Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
John PrescottDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, Italy.
Erminio MonteleoneDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, Italy.
John E HayesSensory Evaluation Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Impact of Receptor Polymorphisms on Sensations from Common Oral IrritantsR03DC010904 · NIDCD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HAYES, JOHN EDWARD · 2011 to 2013
$454k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC010904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last half-century, variable responses to sweetness have repeatedly been shown to fall into a small number of hedonic responses, implying that looking only at group means may can obfuscate meaningfully different response patterns. Comparative data for sourness is quite sparse, especially in adults. While increased liking with higher acid concentration has been reported for some children, in adults, sourness is classically assumed to be aversive, with a monotonic drop in liking with increasing sourness. Here, we test this assumption using a simple model system or experimental beverage in convenience samples of adults from the United States (increasing citric acid in water) and Italy (increasing citric acid in pear juice). Participants rated intensity and liking of sampled stimuli. For both cohorts, we find clear evidence of three distinct patterns of responses: a strong negative group where liking dropped with increased sourness, an intermediate group who showed a more muted drop in liking with more sourness, and a strong positive group where liking increased with more sourness. Strikingly, both cohorts showed similar proportions of response patterns, with ~63-70% in the strong negative group, and 11-12% in the strong positive group, suggesting these proportions may be stable across cultures. Notably, the three groups did not differ by age or gender. These data support the existence of different hedonic response profiles to sour stimuli in adults, once again highlighting the importance of looking at individual differences and potential consumer segments, rather than merely averaging hedonic responses across all individuals within a group.

Identifiers

PMID38617134
PMCPMC11014420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.