ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2024
Machine learning models using symptoms and clinical variables to predict coronary artery disease on coronary angiography.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing machine learning models and traditional approaches for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Great Masquerader: Vasospastic Angina Mimicking Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary angiography (CAG) is invasive and expensive, while numbers of patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CAG results have no coronary lesions. Aim: To develop machine learning algorithms using symptoms and clinical variables to predict CAD. Material and methods: This study was conducted as a cross-sectional study of patients undergoing CAG. We randomly chose 2082 patients from 2602 patients suspected of CAD as the training set, and 520 patients as the test set. We utilized LASSO regression to do feature selection. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix of different thresholds, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were shown. Support vector machine algorithm performances in 10 folds were conducted in the training set for detecting severe CAD, while XGBoost algorithm performances were conducted in the test set for detecting severe CAD. Results: The algorithm of logistic regression achieved an average AUC of 0.77 in the training set during 10-fold validation and an AUC of 0.75 in the test set. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.1, 11 patients in the test set (520 patients) were screened out, and NPV reached 90.9%. When probability predicted by the model was less than 0.2, 110 patients in the test set were screened out, and reached 83.6%. Meanwhile, when threshold was set to 0.9, PPV reached 97.4%. When the threshold was set to 0.8, PPV reached 91.5%. Conclusions: Machine learning algorithm using data from hospital information systems could assist in severe CAD exclusion and confirmation, and thus help patients avoid unnecessary CAG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.