ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2024
Retrospective analysis of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in paediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation -a multicentre study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defibrotide for prophylaxis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) in pediatric high-risk patients: consensus guidelines from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Guideline
- A reduced-toxicity myeloablative conditioning approach for hematopoietic cell transplant in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is a potentially fatal complication following hematopoietic cell transplantation, high-intensity chemotherapies and increasingly seen with calicheamicin based leukemia therapies. Paediatric specific European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (pEBMT) diagnostic criteria have demonstrated benefit in single center studies compared to historic criteria. Yet, the extent to which they have been universally implemented remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-centre study to examine the potential impact of the Baltimore, modified Seattle and pEBMT criteria on the incidence, severity, and outcomes of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome among paediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation patients. Findings: The incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in this cohort (n = 488) was higher by pEBMT (21.5%) vs historic modified Seattle (15.6%) and Baltimore (7.0%) criteria (p < 0.001). Application of pEBMT criteria identified 44 patients who were not previously diagnosed with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Overall, 70.5% of all patients diagnosed with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome ultimately developed very severe disease and almost half of diagnosed patients required critical care support. Overall survival was significantly lower in patients who were diagnosed with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome vs those who were not. Interpretation: Taken together, pEBMT criteria may be a sensitive method for prompter diagnosis of patients who subsequently develop severe/very severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. To our knowledge, this is the first multi-centre study in the United States (US) to demonstrate that pEBMT guidelines are associated with earlier detection of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Since early initiation of definitive treatment for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome has been associated with improved survival in paediatric patients and implementation of pEBMT criteria appears feasible in the US, universal adoption should facilitate prompter diagnosis and lead to improved outcomes of children with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.