ArticleJournal of Computational Mathematics and Data Science2024
Approximate Bayesian computational methods to estimate the strength of divergent selection in population genomics models.
Article in Journal of Computational Mathematics and Data Science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Statistical estimation of parameters in large models of evolutionary processes is often too computationally inefficient to pursue using exact model likelihoods, even with single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data, which offers a way to reduce the size of genetic data while retaining relevant information. Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) to perform statistical inference about parameters of large models takes the advantage of simulations to bypass direct evaluation of model likelihoods. We develop a mechanistic model to simulate forward-in-time divergent selection with variable migration rates, modes of reproduction (sexual, asexual), length and number of migration-selection cycles. We investigate the computational feasibility of ABC to perform statistical inference and study the quality of estimates on the position of loci under selection and the strength of selection. To expand the parameter space of positions under selection, we enhance the model by implementing an outlier scan on summarized observed data. We evaluate the usefulness of summary statistics well-known to capture the strength of selection, and assess their informativeness under divergent selection. We also evaluate the effect of genetic drift with respect to an idealized deterministic model with single-locus selection. We discuss the role of the recombination rate as a confounding factor in estimating the strength of divergent selection, and emphasize its importance in break down of linkage disequilibrium (LD). We answer the question for which part of the parameter space of the model we recover strong signal for estimating the selection, and determine whether population differentiation-based summary statistics or LD-based summary statistics perform well in estimating selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.