Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38616802›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic research and reviews2024

Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Medial Compartmental Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Early Postoperative Recovery.

Artit Laoruengthana, Kongpob Reosanguanwong, Piti Rattanaprichavej, Kamonnop Sahasoonthorn, Nopparat Santisathaporn, Krit Pongpirul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Artit LaoruengthanaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5827-6411
Kongpob ReosanguanwongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Piti RattanaprichavejDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Kamonnop SahasoonthornDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Nopparat SantisathapornDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Krit PongpirulDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-9761
Naresuan University · THJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may provide better physiological knee kinematics, proprioception, and quadricep recovery than posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. Therefore, we hypothesized that CR TKA with multimodal pain control may provide comparable postoperative pain and recovery as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Methods: This study included patients with isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent CR TKA and UKA. TKA and UKA patients were propensity score-matched with age and body mass index (BMI) and compared using visual analog scales (VAS) for pain scores, total amount of morphine use (TMU), knee flexion angle, straight leg raise (SLR), independent ambulation, length of hospital stay (LOS), and costs during hospitalization. Results: After propensity score matching, 46 patients were included in the TKA and UKA groups, respectively, with no differences in demographic data. VAS at 6-72 h and TMU at 48 h after surgery were comparable between the groups. The knee flexion angle in the UKA group was significantly higher at 24 h (60.0° vs 46.6°; p<0.001) and 48 h (76.9° vs 69.1°; p = 0.021) than that in the TKA group. The SLR in the UKA group was significantly higher than that in the TKA group at 24-72 h. The UKA group ambulated significantly earlier (1.56 vs 2.13 days; p<0.001), had shorter LOS (3.68 vs 4.28 days; p<0.004) and incurred 12.43% lower costs when compared to the TKA group. Conclusion: Patients who underwent CR TKA with multimodal pain management did not experience more postoperative pain or morphine use than those who underwent UKA. However, UKA patients seem to experienced faster recovery and shorter LOS than CR-TKA patients during the early postoperative course. Accordingly, UKA may be considered instead of TKA for patients who are good candidates for UKA and require expedited recovery.

Indexed as

cruciate-retainingpostoperative painrecoverytotal knee arthroplastyunicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID38616802
PMCPMC11016268
OpenAlexW4394684684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.