ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2024
Real-world evidence and patient preference for subcutaneous
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05304520 (SISTER - Subcutaneous), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SISTER - Subcutaneous: Non-Interventional Study for Tysabri Patient Preference - Experience From Real World
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The potential and therapeutic advances of the integrin family in neurological disorders.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Subcutaneous natalizumab administration in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of EASIER 2 study.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Time and Motion Study to Quantify Time for Tysabri (Natalizumab) Intravenous Versus Subcutaneous to Treat Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in France, Spain, and the United Kingdom.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Patient SAtisfaction with the TYSabri SC Formulation - A Swiss multi-centriC, prospective non-intervenTIONal study: the SATYSFACTION study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Biological and clinical stability after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous natalizumab in RRMS under standard and extended dosing.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
- Use of subcutaneous natalizumab in routine care - Final results of a non-interventional, observational study (SISTER) in Germany and Austria.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Access, satisfaction, adherence and safety to subcutaneous natalizumab compared to intravenous natalizumab in multiple sclerosis in a real-life cohort: first report from Latin America.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Clinical Practice Evidence of Treatment Satisfaction with Moderate and High-Efficacy Drugs in Multiple Sclerosis.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Twenty years of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: lessons learned and future outlook.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Review
- Patient Preference and Time Allocation Associated with Transition from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Administration of Natalizumab (Tysabri) in Patients with Relapsing Remitting MS - A Questionnaire Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Quality of life and tolerability of B-cell directed therapy of multiple sclerosis with ofatumumab in a patient-centered real-world observational study.Journal of neurology · 2024Observational
- Beyond lines of treatment: embracing early high-efficacy disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis management.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2024Review
- Travel barriers to amyloid-targeting infusion access among older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The consideration of patient preference for a certain drug route of administration (RoA) plays an important role in promoting patient adherence in chronic diseases. Natalizumab is an established treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and can be administered as intravenous (IV) infusion or subcutaneous (SC) injection developed to enable a shorter and easier administration Study objectives: Primary objective is to compare patients' preference for RoA and satisfaction with SC Design and methods: SISTER (Subcutaneous: Non-Interventional Study for Tysabri Patient Preference - Experience from Real World) is an ongoing, prospective, observational study where natalizumab is utilized according to local label. RRMS patients are included in three natalizumab cohorts: Patients switching from current IV to SC administration (switcher) and patients newly starting natalizumab on either SC or IV route (starter SC/IV). This interim analysis includes 262 patients (184 switchers, 39 SC starters, and 39 IV starters), median observation period was 9 months. Results: 80.8% IV starters and 93.9% SC starters reported at baseline that they prefer the assigned RoA. Although initial satisfaction with chosen RoA was maintained over time from baseline through Month 12 in all three cohorts, the wish for change of the current RoA after 6 and 12 months was more frequently expressed among IV starters than in either SC cohort. Consistently, six patients (23.1%) starting with IV changed their RoA from IV to SC route.Mean global treatment satisfaction according to TSQM-II score at baseline remained high in the switcher group and increased through Month 12 in both IV and SC starter cohorts. Conclusion: Based on current data, there is a trend toward patients' preference for the natalizumab SC route over the IV route, which provides valuable insights into patients' preference for natalizumab RoA in routine care and complements available data from clinical studies with real-world data on SC natalizumab. Trial registration: This observational (non-interventional) study was registered in the local German PEI register for non-interventional studies (NIS-No. 611) and in the international CTgov register (NCT05304520).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.