Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38616781›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2024

Real-world evidence and patient preference for subcutaneous

Ralf Gold, Stephan Schmidt, Florian Deisenhammer, Jeremias Motte, Nils Richter, Kirsi Taipale, Hans Christian Salmen, Christian Bohland, Ksenija Schirduan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05304520 (SISTER - Subcutaneous), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05304520 completednot on this map

SISTER - Subcutaneous: Non-Interventional Study for Tysabri Patient Preference - Experience From Real World

TypeobservationalSponsorBiogenRan2021 to 2024Enrolled318ConditionsRelapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)ArmsNatalizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ralf GoldDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, Bochum 44791, Germany.
Stephan SchmidtGesundheitszentrum St. Johannes Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Florian DeisenhammerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Jeremias MotteDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Nils RichterGemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Kirsi TaipaleBiogen GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Hans Christian SalmenBiogen GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Christian BohlandBiogen GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Ksenija SchirduanBiogen GmbH, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0666-7444
Innsbruck Medical University · ATRuhr University Bochum · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The consideration of patient preference for a certain drug route of administration (RoA) plays an important role in promoting patient adherence in chronic diseases. Natalizumab is an established treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and can be administered as intravenous (IV) infusion or subcutaneous (SC) injection developed to enable a shorter and easier administration Study objectives: Primary objective is to compare patients' preference for RoA and satisfaction with SC Design and methods: SISTER (Subcutaneous: Non-Interventional Study for Tysabri Patient Preference - Experience from Real World) is an ongoing, prospective, observational study where natalizumab is utilized according to local label. RRMS patients are included in three natalizumab cohorts: Patients switching from current IV to SC administration (switcher) and patients newly starting natalizumab on either SC or IV route (starter SC/IV). This interim analysis includes 262 patients (184 switchers, 39 SC starters, and 39 IV starters), median observation period was 9 months. Results: 80.8% IV starters and 93.9% SC starters reported at baseline that they prefer the assigned RoA. Although initial satisfaction with chosen RoA was maintained over time from baseline through Month 12 in all three cohorts, the wish for change of the current RoA after 6 and 12 months was more frequently expressed among IV starters than in either SC cohort. Consistently, six patients (23.1%) starting with IV changed their RoA from IV to SC route.Mean global treatment satisfaction according to TSQM-II score at baseline remained high in the switcher group and increased through Month 12 in both IV and SC starter cohorts. Conclusion: Based on current data, there is a trend toward patients' preference for the natalizumab SC route over the IV route, which provides valuable insights into patients' preference for natalizumab RoA in routine care and complements available data from clinical studies with real-world data on SC natalizumab. Trial registration: This observational (non-interventional) study was registered in the local German PEI register for non-interventional studies (NIS-No. 611) and in the international CTgov register (NCT05304520).

Indexed as

drug administration routesmultiple sclerosisnatalizumabpatient preferencerelapsing-remittingtreatment adherence and compliance

Identifiers

PMID38616781
PMCPMC11015759
OpenAlexW4394787894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.