Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38616729›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2024

Antigenicity assessment of SARS-CoV-2 saltation variant BA.2.87.1.

Sijie Yang, Yuanling Yu, Fanchong Jian, Ayijiang Yisimayi, Weiliang Song, Jingyi Liu, Peng Wang, Yanli Xu, Jing Wang, Xiao Niu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sijie YangBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yuanling YuChangping Laboratory, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Fanchong JianBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ayijiang YisimayiBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Weiliang SongBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jingyi LiuBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peng WangChangping Laboratory, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yanli XuBeijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jing WangChangping Laboratory, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiao NiuBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lingling YuChangping Laboratory, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yao WangChangping Laboratory, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Fei ShaoChangping Laboratory, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ronghua JinBeijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Youchun WangChangping Laboratory, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yunlong CaoBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent emergence of a SARS-CoV-2 saltation variant, BA.2.87.1, which features 65 spike mutations relative to BA.2, has attracted worldwide attention. In this study, we elucidate the antigenic characteristics and immune evasion capability of BA.2.87.1. Our findings reveal that BA.2.87.1 is more susceptible to XBB-induced humoral immunity compared to JN.1. Notably, BA.2.87.1 lacks critical escaping mutations in the receptor binding domain (RBD) thus allowing various classes of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) that were escaped by XBB or BA.2.86 subvariants to neutralize BA.2.87.1, although the deletions in the N-terminal domain (NTD), specifically 15-23del and 136-146del, compensate for the resistance to humoral immunity. Interestingly, several neutralizing antibody drugs have been found to restore their efficacy against BA.2.87.1, including SA58, REGN-10933 and COV2-2196. Hence, our results suggest that BA.2.87.1 may not become widespread until it acquires multiple RBD mutations to achieve sufficient immune evasion comparable to that of JN.1.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19Immune EvasionSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAnimalsAntigens, ViralHumansImmunity, HumoralMutationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2humoral immunityimmune escapeneutralizing antibodiessaltation variantSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38616729
PMCPMC11073414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.