Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38616710›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2025

A novel whole-team training programme for adult eating disorder services in England: rationale, development and preliminary evaluation.

Kat Novogrudsky, Tom Gray, Emily Mitchell, Chris Attoe, Nikola Kern, Jess Griffiths, Lucy Serpell, Janet Treasure, Ulrike Schmidt

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kat NovogrudskyKing's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3482-6727
Tom GraySouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Emily MitchellSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Chris AttoeSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nikola KernSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jess GriffithsSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lucy SerpellUniversity College London, UK.
Janet TreasureKing's College London, UK.
Ulrike SchmidtKing's College London, UK.
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W002418/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodIn response to recommendations for improving the quality and coordination of care delivered by eating disorder services, a whole-team training programme was commissioned by Health Education England in 2020. This paper describes the development and evaluation of the Eating Disorder Services for Adults (EDSA) whole-team training course, delivered to National Health Service adult eating disorder community teams in England. Course participants (

resultsAll course aspects were rated as highly enjoyable, meeting participants' training needs and fostering reflective practice. Thematic analysis identified themes relating to key innovative features of the course and suggestions for improvements. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Preliminary evaluation suggests that EDSA is valued by clinicians to enhance their knowledge, skills and ability to improve eating disorder patient care.

Indexed as

competencycurriculumfoundation doctorsPostgraduate medical educationpsychiatric placement

Identifiers

PMID38616710
PMCPMC12171845
OpenAlexW4394818432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.