Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38616231›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2024

Investigating the level of vitamin D receptor gene expression in two tumoral and healthy breast tissues in breast cancer patients and its association with prognostic factors.

Maryam Bahador, Marjan Saeedi Nejad, Shahriar Dabiri, Mohammad Hasan Larizadeh, Maryam Fekri Soofiabadi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase in cancer: diagnostic applications and related treatment strategies.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maryam BahadorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Marjan Saeedi NejadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. mahlasng6886@gmail.com.
Shahriar DabiriDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mohammad Hasan LarizadehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Maryam Fekri SoofiabadiPathology and Stem Cell Research Center, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Kerman University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is one of the most common cancers known among women. This study aimed to investigate the level of vitamin D receptor gene expression in two tumoral and healthy breast tissues in breast cancer patients and its association with prognostic factors.

methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 2022 on 50 patients with high suspicion of breast cancer who were candidates for mastectomy and lumpectomy in a learning hospital. From the patients, two tissue samples were prepared, and there was a total of 100 samples. The samples were subjected to H/E staining and evaluated by a pathologist. The presence or absence of malignancy in each sample was confirmed by two pathologists, and HER2/ER/PR indices were determined. Descriptive and analytical statistical methods and SPSS version 22 software were used.

resultsThe average age of the patients was 51.60 ± 11.22 years old, and the average tumor size was 3.17 ± 1.28. Most tumors were grade 2 (48%). The expression of HER2, ER, and PR was positive in 24, 64, and 54%, respectively. The largest number of cases were in stage 2A. The expression level of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene in healthy tissue (2.08 ± 1.01) was higher than tumoral tissue (0.25 ± 1.38) (P = 0.001). In tumoral and healthy tissue, VDR expression was not significant according to tumor grade, HER2, ER, PR, LVI, LN, disease stage, age, and tumor size.

conclusionsThe expression level of VDR in healthy tissue was significantly higher than tumoral tissue. However, there was no significant relationship between VDR and tumor grade, HER2, ER, PR, LVI, LN, disease stage, age, and tumor size.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, CalcitriolBreast cancerPrognostic indicatorsVitamin D expression level

Identifiers

PMID38616231
PMCPMC13313820
OpenAlexW4394799564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.