ArticleScientific reports2024
Longitudinal optical coherence tomography indices in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of CSF pressures, OCT parameters, and transorbital ultrasonographic measurements in ıdiopathic ıntracranial hypertension.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- How to diagnose papilloedema.Practical neurology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Ability of Transverse Axial Images Obtained by Optical Coherence Tomography for Detecting Anterior Displacement of Peripapillary Tissues in Papilledema.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyObservational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) may result in optic nerve fiber loss and even atrophy. The timing of the optical coherence tomography (OCT) indices reaching the lowest point (nadir) and the factors that predict the patient's anatomical outcome are not known. We aimed to determine the timing and the factors that affect nadir retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. The medical records of 99 IIH patients who were treated from December 2009 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean RNFL thickness at presentation was 263.5 ± 106.4 µm. The mean time to nadir was 7.9 ± 6.3 months. The average RNFL and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness at the nadir were 92.6 ± 14.5 µm (47% showed thinning) and 77.9 ± 27.8 µm (70% showed thinning), respectively. The Frisén disc edema stage and average RNFL thickness at baseline correlated with a longer time to nadir, (r = 0.28 P = 0.003 and r = 0.24, P = 0.012, respectively). The nadir average RNFL thickness and the nadir average GCC thickness (r = 0.32, P = 0.001, r = 0.29, P = 0.002, respectively) correlated with the baseline visual field mean deviation. The final anatomical outcome of IIH episodes in this study resulted in RNFL and GCC thinning. The time to RNFL nadir and its values correlated with IIH severity at presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.