Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38615167›Full record

ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences2024

Development and validation of a multi-modality fusion deep learning model for differentiating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases.

Shanshan Shen, Chunquan Li, Yaohua Fan, Shanfu Lu, Ziye Yan, Hu Liu, Haihang Zhou, Zijian Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Deep learning models based on fused ultrasound images for the assessment of cystocele in women].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shanshan ShenDepartment of Oncology, Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing Zhejiang 314000. shenshanshan@jxey.com.
Chunquan LiInformation Engineering School of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031.
Yaohua FanDepartment of Oncology, Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing Zhejiang 314000.
Shanfu LuPerception Vision Medical Technologies Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510530.
Ziye YanPerception Vision Medical Technologies Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510530.
Hu LiuDepartment of Radiology, Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing Zhejiang 314000.
Haihang ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing Zhejiang 314000.
Zijian ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China. wanzzj@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2023JJ50014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGlioblastoma (GBM) and brain metastases (BMs) are the two most common malignant brain tumors in adults. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a commonly used method for screening and evaluating the prognosis of brain tumors, but the specificity and sensitivity of conventional MRI sequences in differential diagnosis of GBM and BMs are limited. In recent years, deep neural network has shown great potential in the realization of diagnostic classification and the establishment of clinical decision support system. This study aims to apply the radiomics features extracted by deep learning techniques to explore the feasibility of accurate preoperative classification for newly diagnosed GBM and solitary brain metastases (SBMs), and to further explore the impact of multimodality data fusion on classification tasks.

methodsStandard protocol cranial MRI sequence data from 135 newly diagnosed GBM patients and 73 patients with SBMs confirmed by histopathologic or clinical diagnosis were retrospectively analyzed. First, structural T

resultsThe radiomics features using machine learning and the multi-modal fusion method had a good discriminatory ability for GBM and SBMs. Furthermore, compared with single-modal data, the multimodal fusion models using machine learning algorithms such as support vector machine (SVM), Logistic regression, RF, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) achieved significant improvements, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.974, 0.978, 0.943, 0.938, and 0.947, respectively; our comparative disentangled multi-modal MR fusion method performs well, and the results of AUC, accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN) and specificity(SPE) in the test set were 0.985, 0.984, 0.900, and 0.990, respectively. Compared with other multi-modal fusion methods, AUC, ACC, and SEN in this study all achieved the best performance. In the ablation experiment to verify the effects of each module component in this study, AUC, ACC, and SEN increased by 1.6%, 10.9% and 15.0%, respectively after 3 loss functions were used simultaneously.

conclusionsA deep learning-based contrast disentangled multi-modal MR radiomics feature fusion technique helps to improve GBM and SBMs classification accuracy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGlioblastomaAdultAlgorithmsHumansRetrospective Studiesdeep learningdisentanglementglioblastomamultimodality datasolitary brain metastases

Identifiers

PMID38615167
PMCPMC11017031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.