Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38615090›Full record

ReviewJournal of echocardiography2024

Myocardial motion in acute ischemia: revealing invisible deformation by echocardiography.

Toshihiko Asanuma

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of echocardiography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshihiko AsanumaDivision of Cardiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya-Cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan. toshiasanuma@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-9849
Shimane University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echocardiography has been used clinically to assess regional myocardial wall motion for the diagnosis of acute myocardial ischemia or stress-induced ischemia, but it is often difficult to distinguish hypokinetic motion from normal motion. Myocardial wall motion is affected by loading conditions as well as intrinsic contractility, making it challenging to define a normal range of wall motion. Therefore, hypokinesis is usually diagnosed by comparing target areas with other areas of myocardium considered normal (relative hypokinesis). Myocardial strain analysis by tissue Doppler echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography has enabled objective and quantitative evaluation of regional myocardial wall motion. Peak systolic strain decreases during acute ischemia, but subtle and invisible myocardial motion, such as early systolic lengthening (ESL) and postsystolic shortening (PSS), also occurs, and the analysis of these subtle motions can improve the diagnostic accuracy of ischemia. However, the diagnosis of ischemic myocardium by strain analysis is not widely performed in clinical practice at this time due to several limitations. This article reviews the features of myocardial motion during acute ischemia, the mechanisms of ESL and PSS, the diagnosis of ischemic myocardium using strain analysis, and current approaches and future challenges to overcome the limitations in the detection of relative hypokinesis. This article also explains the use of ESL and PSS to detect myocardial ischemic memory that remains after brief ischemia.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyMyocardial ContractionMyocardial IschemiaAcute DiseaseHumansSystoleEarly systolic lengtheningEchocardiographyIschemiaMyocardial strainPostsystolic shorteningRelative hypokinesis

Identifiers

PMID38615090
OpenAlexW4394782747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.