ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Imaging features of perinephric myxoid pseudotumors of fat.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perinephric Myxoid Pseudotumor of Fat: Case Series, Systematic Review of the Literature, Clinical Classification, and Treatment Implications.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Perinephric myxoid tumour of fat and IgG4-related disease: when retroperitoneal fat conceals two truths. A case report of a tricky diagnosis.BJR case reports · 2025Article
- Perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat - histopathological and molecular characterization of 3 cases after renal transplantation.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRetrospectively evaluate multimodality imaging features of perinephric myxoid pseudotumor of fat (PMPTF).
methodsInstitutional cases of PMPTF with CT, MRI and/or ultrasound evaluation from 1/1/2020 to 9/1/2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics and clinical history were reviewed, and imaging features recorded.
results14 patients with pathologically-proven PMPTF were identified (11 M, 3 F; mean age 66.7 ± 17.0 years; range 40-87 years). Three patients (18%) had bilateral lesions; a total of 17 PMPTFs were reviewed. 15/17 (88%) were biopsy-proven; two cases were diagnosed by imaging only in patients with a contralateral biopsy-proven PMPTF. All evaluable specimens were negative for MDM2 amplification. 11/17 (65%) occurred in patients with renal disease, including 4/17 (24%) in patients with renal transplant. 100% (17/17) had CT, 11/17 (65%) MRI, and 6/17 (35%) ultrasound. The mean largest lesion dimension was 10.9 ± 4.6 cm (range 4.3-17.0 cm). Of cases involving native kidneys, 7/13 (54%) presented as multifocal perinephric masses and 5/13 (38%) as a solitary perinephric mass. All four transplant cases presented as infiltrative-appearing masses involving the renal sinus with lesser perinephric involvement. 14/17 (82%) lesions contained macroscopic fat on CT and MRI and 3/17 (18%) showed no macroscopic fat, all involving renal transplants. All cases with MRI demonstrated T2 hyperintensity with signal dropout on opposed-phase imaging. 11/13 (85%) PMPTF showed no or equivocal CT enhancement. Enhancement was better seen on MRI in all cases evaluated by both CT and MRI. Of the six PMPTFs imaged by ultrasound, four (67%) were heterogeneously hypoechoic and two (33%) had mixed regions of hypo-, iso- and hyperechogenicity relative to adjacent renal parenchyma.
conclusionsPMPTF is a rare, benign, and underrecognized lesion that may mimic malignancy, particularly retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma. The imaging features of this unusual pseudosarcoma differ in native and transplanted kidneys. Improved awareness of this entity will facilitate appropriate patient management and avoid unnecessary intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38615061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.