Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38614631›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Global health2024

Safety and immunogenicity of the Euvichol-S oral cholera vaccine for prevention of Vibrio cholerae O1 infection in Nepal: an observer-blind, active-controlled, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.

Katerina Rok Song, Ram Hari Chapagain, Dipesh Tamrakar, Rajeev Shrestha, Piush Kanodia, Shipra Chaudhary, T Anh Wartel, Jae Seung Yang, Deok Ryun Kim, Jinae Lee and 17 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04760236 (Phase III, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Randomized, Active Controlled Trial to Evaluate Immune Non-Inferiority, Safety and Lot-to-Lot Consistency of OCV-S Compared to Shanchol™ in 1 to 40 Years Old Healthy Nepalese Participants), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04760236 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III, Multicenter, Observer-Blinded, Randomized, Active Controlled Trial to Evaluate Immune Non-Inferiority, Safety and Lot-to-Lot Consistency of OCV-S Compared to Shanchol™ in 1 to 40 Years Old Healthy Nepalese Participants

TypeinterventionalSponsorInternational Vaccine InstituteRan2021 to 2023Enrolled2,530ConditionsCholeraArmsOral Cholera Vaccine Simplified (OCV-S), Shanchol™
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Katerina Rok SongClinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: katerina.song@ivi.int.
Ram Hari ChapagainDepartment of Pediatric Medicine, Kanti Children's Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dipesh TamrakarCenter for Clinical Trial Studies, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Rajeev ShresthaCenter for Clinical Trial Studies, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Piush KanodiaDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Nepalgunj Medical College, Nepalgunj, Nepal.
Shipra ChaudharyDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
T Anh WartelInternational Vaccine Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jae Seung YangScience Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Deok Ryun KimDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Management, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Jinae LeeDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Management, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Lyeong ParkDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Management, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Haeun ChoDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Management, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Jiyoung LeeDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Management, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Patchara ThaisrivichaiDepartment of Program Management, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Sridhar VemulaClinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Bo Mi KimClinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Birendra GuptaClinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Tarun SalujaClinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Ruchir Kumar PansuriyaVaccine Process Development Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea; Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Ravi GanapathyResearch and Development, Hilleman Laboratories, Singapore.
Yeong Ok BaikResearch and Development Division, EuBiologics, Seoul, South Korea.
Young Jin LeeResearch and Development Division, EuBiologics, Seoul, South Korea.
Suhi JeonProduction Division, EuBiologics, Seoul, South Korea.
Youngran ParkBusiness Division, EuBiologics, Seoul, South Korea.
Howard L HerResearch and Development Division, EuBiologics, Seoul, South Korea.
Youngshin ParkProduction Division, EuBiologics, Seoul, South Korea.
Julia A LynchClinical, Assessment, Regulatory, Evaluation Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
International Vaccine Institute · KREuBiologics (South Korea) · KRKathmandu University · NPB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · NPKanti Children's Hospital · NPNepal Medical College Teaching Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn October, 2017, WHO launched a strategy to eliminate cholera by 2030. A primary challenge in meeting this goal is the limited global supply capacity of oral cholera vaccine and the worsening of cholera outbreaks since 2021. To help address the current shortage of oral cholera vaccine, a WHO prequalified oral cholera vaccine, Euvichol-Plus was reformulated by reducing the number of components and inactivation methods. We aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of Euvichol-S (EuBiologics, Seoul, South Korea) compared with an active control vaccine, Shanchol (Sanofi Healthcare India, Telangana, India) in participants of various ages in Nepal.

methodsWe did an observer-blind, active-controlled, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial at four hospitals in Nepal. Eligible participants were healthy individuals aged 1-40 years without a history of cholera vaccination. Individuals with a history of hypersensitivity reactions to other preventive vaccines, severe chronic disease, previous cholera vaccination, receipt of blood or blood-derived products in the past 3 months or other vaccine within 4 weeks before enrolment, and pregnant or lactating women were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) by block randomisation (block sizes of two, four, six, or eight) to one of four groups (groups A-D); groups C and D were stratified by age (1-5, 6-17, and 18-40 years). Participants in groups A-C were assigned to receive two 1·5 mL doses of Euvichol-S (three different lots) and participants in group D were assigned to receive the active control vaccine, Shanchol. All participants and site staff (with the exception of those who prepared and administered the study vaccines) were masked to group assignment. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was non-inferiority of immunogenicity of Euvichol-S (group C) versus Shanchol (group D) at 2 weeks after the second vaccine dose, measured by the seroconversion rate, defined as the proportion of participants who had achieved seroconversion (defined as ≥four-fold increase in V cholerae O1 Inaba and Ogawa titres compared with baseline). The primary immunogenicity endpoint was assessed in the per-protocol analysis set, which included all participants who received all their planned vaccine administrations, had no important protocol deviations, and who provided blood samples for all immunogenicity assessments. The primary safety endpoint was the number of solicited adverse events, unsolicited adverse events, and serious adverse events after each vaccine dose in all ages and each age stratum, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of the Euvichol-S or Shanchol. Non-inferiority of Euvichol-S compared with Shanchol was shown if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference between the seroconversion rates in Euvichol-S group C versus Shanchol group D was above the predefined non-inferiority margin of -10%. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04760236.

findingsBetween Oct 6, 2021, and Jan 19, 2022, 2529 healthy participants (1261 [49·9%] males; 1268 [50·1%] females), were randomly assigned to group A (n=330; Euvichol-S lot number ES-2002), group B (n=331; Euvichol-S ES-2003), group C (n=934; Euvichol-S ES-2004]), or group D (n=934; Shanchol). Non-inferiority of Euvichol-S versus Shanchol in seroconversion rate for both serotypes at 2 weeks after the second dose was confirmed in all ages (difference in seroconversion rate for V cholerae O1 Inaba -0·00 [95% CI -1·86 to 1·86]; for V cholerae O1 Ogawa -1·62 [-4·80 to 1·56]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 244 (9·7%) of 2529 participants in the safety analysis set, with a total of 403 events; 247 events were reported among 151 (9·5%) of 1595 Euvichol-S recipients and 156 events among 93 (10·0%) of 934 Shanchol recipients. Pyrexia was the most common adverse event in both groups (57 events among 56 [3·5%] of 1595 Euvichol-S recipients and 37 events among 35 [3·7%] of 934 Shanchol recipients). No serious adverse events were deemed to be vaccine-related.

interpretationA two-dose regimen of Euvichol-S vaccine was non-inferior to the active control vaccine, Shanchol, in terms of seroconversion rates 2 weeks after the second dose. The simplified formulation and production requirements of the Euvichol-S vaccine have the potential to increase the supply of oral cholera vaccine and reduce the gap between the current oral cholera vaccine supply and demand.

fundingThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. TRANSLATION: For the Nepali translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

CholeraCholera VaccinesVibrio cholerae O1FemaleHumansLactationMaleNepalPregnancyCholera Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38614631
PMCPMC11027156
OpenAlexW4394709958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.