Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38613820›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Large language models facilitate the generation of electronic health record phenotyping algorithms.

Chao Yan, Henry H Ong, Monika E Grabowska, Matthew S Krantz, Wu-Chen Su, Alyson L Dickson, Josh F Peterson, QiPing Feng, Dan M Roden, C Michael Stein and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Natural Language Processing Algorithm Accurately Classifies Diverticulitis-Related Complications and Predicts Long-Term Outcomes.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prospects and perils of ChatGPT in diabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chao YanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6719-1388
Henry H OngDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
Monika E GrabowskaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
Matthew S KrantzDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
Wu-Chen SuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
Alyson L DicksonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
Josh F PetersonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
QiPing FengDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
Dan M RodenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
C Michael SteinDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
V Eric KerchbergerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0342-1965
Bradley A MalinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
Wei-Qi WeiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records (VGER) ProjectU01HG011181 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAN M RODEN, Digna R Velez Edwards · 2020 to 2026
$7.0M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM152284 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher S. Williams · 2024 to 2026
$4.8M
Drug repositioning for Alzheimer's disease via genetics, electronic health records, and human iPSC modelsR01AG069900 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LI, BINGSHAN, WEI, WEI-QI · 2021 to 2025
$4.0M
Transforming dbGaP genetic and genomic data to FAIR-ready by artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithmsR01LM012806 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Zhongming Zhao · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Genetics and Triglycerides: opportunities for new approaches to identify therapiesR01HL163854 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FENG, QIPING · 2022 to 2025
$3.1M
Predictive modeling of Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (ADRD) in the elderly population empowered by knowledge-driven data miningR01HG012748 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HONGFANG LIU · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Targeting Residual ASCVD Risk by Integrating Genetics and Clinical DataR01HL171809 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Qiping Feng, Wei-Qi Wei · 2024 to 2026
$2.6M
PheMAP: Measured, Automated Profile to Facilitate High Throughput PhenotypingR01GM139891 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WEI, WEI-QI · 2021 to 2024
$1.7M
Systematically screening and validating drug repurposing candidates for Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasR01AG084550 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Qiping Feng, Wei-Qi Wei · 2025 to 2026
$1.7M
Systematically screening and validating drug repurposing candidates for Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasR56AG084550 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FENG, QIPING, WEI, WEI-QI · 2024 to 2024
$875k
National Institute of Health R01GM139891NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012748NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG011181NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL157755NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL163854NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL171809NIA NIH HHS F30 AG080885NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069900NIA NIH HHS R01 AG084550NIA NIH HHS R56 AG084550NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139891NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152284NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPhenotyping is a core task in observational health research utilizing electronic health records (EHRs). Developing an accurate algorithm demands substantial input from domain experts, involving extensive literature review and evidence synthesis. This burdensome process limits scalability and delays knowledge discovery. We investigate the potential for leveraging large language models (LLMs) to enhance the efficiency of EHR phenotyping by generating high-quality algorithm drafts. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe prompted four LLMs-GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 of ChatGPT, Claude 2, and Bard-in October 2023, asking them to generate executable phenotyping algorithms in the form of SQL queries adhering to a common data model (CDM) for three phenotypes (ie, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and hypothyroidism). Three phenotyping experts evaluated the returned algorithms across several critical metrics. We further implemented the top-rated algorithms and compared them against clinician-validated phenotyping algorithms from the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network.

resultsGPT-4 and GPT-3.5 exhibited significantly higher overall expert evaluation scores in instruction following, algorithmic logic, and SQL executability, when compared to Claude 2 and Bard. Although GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 effectively identified relevant clinical concepts, they exhibited immature capability in organizing phenotyping criteria with the proper logic, leading to phenotyping algorithms that were either excessively restrictive (with low recall) or overly broad (with low positive predictive values).

conclusionGPT versions 3.5 and 4 are capable of drafting phenotyping algorithms by identifying relevant clinical criteria aligned with a CDM. However, expertise in informatics and clinical experience is still required to assess and further refine generated algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsPhenotypeDementiaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypothyroidismNatural Language ProcessingChatGPTelectronic health recordslarge language modelsphenotyping

Identifiers

PMID38613820
PMCPMC11339509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.