ReviewInternational journal of hematology2024
Bispecific antibodies for multiple myeloma: past, present and future.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infection risk associated with talquetamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review with meta-analysis of talquetamab monotherapy and descriptive analysis of combination therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Characteristics and utilization of the three BCMA-targeted therapies in multiple myeloma.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Incidence and Characteristics of Infectious Complications in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Bispecific Antibodies.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the development of various therapeutic agents, multiple myeloma remains incurable. Recently, T-cell redirected immunotherapy has become a promising strategy for the treatment of refractory myeloma. Clinical trials using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells and bispecific antibodies have demonstrated successful anti-myeloma responses in triple-class-refractory patients. However, unique and unwanted immune effects associated with on-target/off-target reactivity of activated immune cells need to be considered and properly managed. This review summarizes recent advances in bispecific antibodies for the treatment of refractory myeloma. It outlines the history of their development, along with a discussion of their mechanisms of action and their current and potential future role in myeloma therapy. As more evidence emerges to inform the timing of CAR-T-cell therapy, the results of clinical trials and off-the-shelf nature of bispecifics also suggest the timing of their treatment. These findings will promote further development and application of bispecifics for refractory myeloma in combination with other appropriate agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.