Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38613720›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2024

Differences in scanpath pattern and verbal working memory predicts efficient reading in the Cloze gap-filling test.

Paulo G Laurence, Stella A Bassetto, Natalia P Bertolino, Mayara S C V O Barros, Elizeu C Macedo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paulo G LaurenceHuman Developmental Sciences Graduate Program, Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil. pauloguirro.laurence1@mackenzista.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0177-6778
Stella A BassettoSocial and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Rua Piaui, No 181, 10th Floor, São Paulo, 01241-001, Brazil.
Natalia P BertolinoSocial and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Rua Piaui, No 181, 10th Floor, São Paulo, 01241-001, Brazil.
Mayara S C V O BarrosSocial and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Rua Piaui, No 181, 10th Floor, São Paulo, 01241-001, Brazil.
Elizeu C MacedoHuman Developmental Sciences Graduate Program, Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1412-3450

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 309159/2019-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/08069-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/09654-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different tests measure text comprehension, including the cloze gap-filling test, often used for language learning. Different studies hypothesized cognitive strategies in this type of test and their relationship with working memory and performance. However, no study investigated the cloze test, working memory, and possible cognitive strategies, while performing the test. Therefore, this study aimed to identify cognitive visual strategies in the cloze test by applying an unsupervised algorithm and to analyze the relationship between these strategies with working memory and performance in the cloze test. Our sample consisted of 51 university students, the largest sample in studies of cognitive strategies with cloze tests. Participants answered an 11-item cloze test in a computer with eye-tracking, a verbal working memory test, and a visuospatial working memory test. Our analysis of participants' scanpath identified two main strategies: one with fewer toggles between text and word bank and fewer fixations than the other one, indicating the existence of a global strategy. Furthermore, a model predicting the efficiency of participants in the cloze test found that item complexity, using a global strategy, and higher scores of working memory were the most significant predictors. These results confirm the hypothesis of a global strategy being related to successfully achieving higher-order reading processes.

Indexed as

ComprehensionMemory, Short-TermReadingAdolescentAdultEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEye-trackingGap-filling testScan-pathShort-term memoryText comprehensionWorking memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.