SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Comparative analysis of surgical treatment modalities for a popliteal pterygium: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Walking Ability After Microsurgical Reconstruction of Pediatric Popliteal Pterygium Syndrome-A Case Report.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPopliteal pterygium syndrome is a rare congenital disorder characterized by orofacial, cutaneous, musculoskeletal, and genital anomalies. The popliteal pterygium (PP) affects ambulation due to severe knee flexion contracture and equinovarus deformities. Surgical treatment aims to correct these deformities while preserving limb sensibility. However, due to its rarity, surgical guidelines are lacking. MATERIALS AND
methodsA meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted to summarize and compare surgical methods for PP. 183 paper were identified in PubMed and data from 32 articles were analyzed, including patient demographics, treatment modalities (Ilizarov fixator, femoral osteotomy, skin/soft tissue procedures, hamstring release, nerve surgery, and amputation), pre- and post-operative abilities to walk, knee joint parameters, complications, and recurrent contractions.
resultsAmong 58 patients (87 limbs), Ilizarov fixator demonstrated improved knee and ankle mobility postoperatively, but showed a relatively high surgical session count and complication rates. Femoral osteotomy achieved successful knee posture correction with fewer sessions and no complications. Isolated skin/soft tissue procedures improved flexion contracture and mobility, though they required several procedures. Hamstring release achieved notable contracture reduction but also necessitated multiple interventions. Nerve surgery and amputation had limited data, warranting further investigation.
conclusionThe management of PP demands a comprehensive approach, considering individual patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. While different surgical modalities offer distinct benefits, a classification or guideline to treat this deformity is still lacking. Further research is essential to validate findings, refine treatment approaches, and enhance the quality of life for individuals with PP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.