Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38613600›Full record

ReviewPhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2024

The use of natural extracts with photoprotective activity: a 2015-2023 patent prospection.

Ana Maria Santos Oliveira, Daniel de Souza Batista, Tailaine Nascimento de Castro, Izabel Almeida Alves, Ricardo Bizogne Souto, Milleno Dantas Mota, Mairim Russo Serafini, Gomathi Rajkumar, Edith Cristina Laignier Cazedey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the In Vitro Photoprotective Effect of a Combination ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Maria Santos OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil. ana_prin6@academico.ufs.br.
Daniel de Souza BatistaPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, State University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Tailaine Nascimento de CastroPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, State University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Izabel Almeida AlvesPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, State University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Ricardo Bizogne SoutoDepartment of Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Milleno Dantas MotaPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, State University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Mairim Russo SerafiniPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Gomathi RajkumarDepartment of Botany, Sri Sarada College for Women (Autonomous), Periyar University, Salem, India.
Edith Cristina Laignier CazedeyPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, State University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Universidade do Estado da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BRPeriyar University · IN

Funding

CAPES 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic sunscreen offers protection against excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun, and protects the skin from possible damage. However, they have low efficacy against the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are highly reactive molecules that can be generated in the skin when it is exposed to UV radiation, and are known to play a role in oxidative stress, which can contribute to skin aging and damage. Thus, there is an ongoing search for sunscreens that do not have these negative effects. One promising source for these is natural products. Therefore, the current patent review summarizes topical formulations made from natural compounds that have antioxidant properties and can be used as photoprotective or anti-aging agents, either using a single natural extract or a combination of extracts. The review reports basic patent information (applicant country, type of applicant, and year of filing) and gives details about the invention, including its chemical composition, and the in vitro and in vivo tests performed. These patents describe natural products that can be used to protect the skin and validate their efficacy, and safety, in addition to standardizing their formulations. The compositions described illustrate the consistent innovation in the use of natural products to protect against UV damage and photoaging disorders, a promising field which is receiving growing global recognition.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsSunscreening AgentsUltraviolet RaysAnimalsAntioxidantsHumansPatents as TopicPlant ExtractsSkinSkin AgingAntioxidantsBiological ProductsPlant ExtractsSunscreening AgentsPhotoagingPhotoprotectionSkinTechnological prospecting

Identifiers

PMID38613600
OpenAlexW4394784699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.