GuidelineCytotherapy2024
Consensus guidelines for the monitoring and management of metachromatic leukodystrophy in the United States.
Guideline in Cytotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rigorous genetic diagnosis review in natural history studies.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Consensus-Based Expert Recommendations for Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Vanishing White Matter.Neurology · 2025Review
- Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Review
- Palliative Care for Children and Adults With Inherited Metabolic Disease in Europe: An Underutilised Service for Supportive Treatment and Care.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
- Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: New Therapy Advancements and Emerging Research Directions.Neurology · 2025Review
- Characterizing Diagnostic Delays in Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: A Real-World Data Approach.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
- Blood Biomarkers Reflecting Brain Pathology-From Common Grounds to Rare Frontiers.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Review
- Evaluation of enzyme activity predictions for variants of unknown significance in Arylsulfatase A.Human genetics · 2025Article
- Metachromatic Leukodystrophy Presenting with Multiple Cranial Nerve and Lumbosacral Nerve Root Enhancement Without White Matter Changes.Neurology international · 2025Article
- Current Advances and Challenges in Gene Therapies for Neurologic Disorders: A Review for the Clinician.Neurology. Genetics · 2025Review
- Characterization of gallbladder disease in metachromatic leukodystrophy across the lifespan.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2025Article
- UPLC-MS/MS High-Risk Screening for Sphingolipidoses Using Dried Urine Spots.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Developmental delay can precede neurologic regression in early onset metachromatic leukodystrophy.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2024Article
- Evaluation of enzyme activity predictions for variants of unknown significance in Arylsulfatase A.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a fatal, progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by biallelic pathogenic mutations in the ARSA (Arylsulfatase A) gene. With the advent of presymptomatic diagnosis and the availability of therapies with a narrow window for intervention, it is critical to define a standardized approach to diagnosis, presymptomatic monitoring, and clinical care. To meet the needs of the MLD community, a panel of MLD experts was established to develop disease-specific guidelines based on healthcare resources in the United States. This group developed a consensus opinion for best-practice recommendations, as follows: (i) Diagnosis should include both genetic and biochemical testing; (ii) Early diagnosis and treatment for MLD is associated with improved clinical outcomes; (iii) The panel supported the development of newborn screening to accelerate the time to diagnosis and treatment; (iv) Clinical management of MLD should include specialists familiar with the disease who are able to follow patients longitudinally; (v) In early onset MLD, including late infantile and early juvenile subtypes, ex vivo gene therapy should be considered for presymptomatic patients where available; (vi) In late-onset MLD, including late juvenile and adult subtypes, hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) should be considered for patients with no or minimal disease involvement. This document summarizes current guidance on the presymptomatic monitoring of children affected by MLD as well as the clinical management of symptomatic patients. Future data-driven evidence and evolution of these recommendations will be important to stratify clinical treatment options and improve clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.