Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38613357›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2024

Deferoxamine topical cream superior to patch in rescuing radiation-induced fibrosis of unwounded and wounded skin.

Charlotte E Berry, Darren B Abbas, Michelle Griffin, Hendrik Lintel, Jason Guo, Lionel Kameni, Andrew A Churukian, Alexander Z Fazilat, Kellen Chen, Geoffrey C Gurtner and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Deferoxamine Improves Radiation-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Charlotte E BerryHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6310-5921
Darren B AbbasHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Michelle GriffinHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Hendrik LintelHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Jason GuoHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Lionel KameniHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Andrew A ChurukianHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Alexander Z FazilatHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Kellen ChenDepartment of Surgery, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Geoffrey C GurtnerDepartment of Surgery, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Michael T LongakerHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Arash MomeniHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Derrick C WanHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4666-1683

Funding

Center for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Tissue and Organ Regeneration (C-DOCTOR)U24DE026914 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHAI, YANG, CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2019
$12.0M
Reprogramming fibroblasts embryonic origins to overcome skin fibrosis and scarring.R01DE032677 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL T LONGAKER, Derrick Wan · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
Defining the role of mechanoresponsive adipocyte-to-fibroblast transition in wound fibrosis.R01AR081343 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL T LONGAKER, Derrick Wan · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR081343NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE032677NIDCR NIH HHS U24 DE026914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical patch delivery of deferoxamine (DFO) has been studied as a treatment for this fibrotic transformation in irradiated tissue. Efficacy of a novel cream formulation of DFO was studied as a RIF therapeutic in unwounded and excisionally wounded irradiated skin. C57BL/6J mice underwent 30 Gy of radiation to the dorsum followed by 4 weeks of recovery. In a first experiment, mice were separated into six conditions: DFO 50 mg cream (D50), DFO 100 mg cream (D100), soluble DFO injections (DI), DFO 1 mg patch (DP), control cream (Vehicle), and irradiated untreated skin (IR). In a second experiment, excisional wounds were created on the irradiated dorsum of mice and then divided into four treatment groups: DFO 100 mg Cream (W-D100), DFO 1 mg patch (W-DP), control cream (W-Vehicle), and irradiated untreated wounds (W-IR). Laser Doppler perfusion scans, biomechanical testing, and histological analysis were performed. In irradiated skin, D100 improved perfusion compared to D50 or DP. Both D100 and DP enhanced dermal characteristics, including thickness, collagen density and 8-isoprostane staining compared to untreated irradiated skin. D100 outperformed DP in CD31 staining, indicating higher vascular density. Extracellular matrix features of D100 and DP resembled normal skin more closely than DI or control. In radiated excisional wounds, D100 facilitated faster wound healing and increased perfusion compared to DP. The 100 mg DFO cream formulation rescued RIF of unwounded irradiated skin and improved excisional wound healing in murine skin relative to patch delivery of DFO.

Indexed as

DeferoxamineRadiation Fibrosis SyndromeAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPerfusionSkinDeferoxaminecreamdeferoxaminefibrosispatchradiationradiation‐induced fibrosiswound healing

Identifiers

PMID38613357
PMCPMC11015393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.