Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38613252›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2024

Effect of sirolimus on muscle in inclusion body myositis observed with magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

Harmen Reyngoudt, Pierre-Yves Baudin, Ericky Caldas de Almeida Araújo, Damien Bachasson, Jean-Marc Boisserie, Kubéraka Mariampillai, Mélanie Annoussamy, Yves Allenbach, Jean-Yves Hogrel, Pierre G Carlier and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Harmen ReyngoudtNMR Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Institute of Myology, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0777-2711
Pierre-Yves BaudinNMR Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Institute of Myology, Paris, France.
Ericky Caldas de Almeida AraújoNMR Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Institute of Myology, Paris, France.
Damien BachassonNeuromuscular Physiology and Evaluation Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Institute of Myology, Paris, France.
Jean-Marc BoisserieNMR Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Institute of Myology, Paris, France.
Kubéraka MariampillaiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Inflammatory Myopathies Reference Center, Research Center in Myology UMR974, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Mélanie AnnoussamyI-Motion, Institute of Myology, Paris, France.
Yves AllenbachDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Inflammatory Myopathies Reference Center, Research Center in Myology UMR974, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Jean-Yves HogrelNeuromuscular Physiology and Evaluation Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Institute of Myology, Paris, France.
Pierre G CarlierCEA, DRF, SHFJ, University Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Benjamin MartyNMR Laboratory, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Institute of Myology, Paris, France.
Olivier BenvenisteDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Inflammatory Myopathies Reference Center, Research Center in Myology UMR974, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Institut de Myologie · FRSorbonne Université · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRInserm · FR

Funding

Appel à projet 2012 Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale - Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soin
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinding sensitive clinical outcome measures has become crucial in natural history studies and therapeutic trials of neuromuscular disorders. Here, we focus on 1-year longitudinal data from quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (

methodsQuantitative MRI and

resultsThe quadriceps and gastrocnemius medialis muscles had the highest FF values, displaying notable heterogeneity and asymmetry, particularly in the quadriceps. In the placebo group, the median 1-year FF increase in the quadriceps was 3.2% (P < 0.001), whereas in the sirolimus group, it was 0.7% (P = 0.033). Both groups experienced a significant decrease in cCSA in the quadriceps after 1 year (P < 0.001), with median changes of 12.6% for the placebo group and 5.5% for the sirolimus group. Differences in FF and cCSA changes between the two groups were significant (P < 0.001). SRM values for FF and cCSA were 1.3 and 1.4 in the placebo group and 0.5 and 0.8 in the sirolimus group, respectively. Water T

conclusionsThis study has demonstrated that quantitative MRI/

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMuscle, SkeletalMyositis, Inclusion BodySirolimusAgedFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedImmunosuppressive AgentsSirolimus31P MRSBiomarkersInclusion body myositisQuantitative MRITreatment

Identifiers

PMID38613252
PMCPMC11154752
OpenAlexW4394785786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.