Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38612956›Full record

Observational studyNutrients2024

Hypophosphatemia after Start of Medical Nutrition Therapy Indicates Early Refeeding Syndrome and Increased Electrolyte Requirements in Critically Ill Patients but Has No Impact on Short-Term Survival.

Mathias Schneeweiss-Gleixner, Patrick Haselwanter, Bruno Schneeweiss, Christian Zauner, Marlene Riedl-Wewalka

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Consensus statements on refeeding syndrome.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Incidence and risk factors of refeeding syndrome in inpatients undergoing enteral and parenteral nutrition hospitalized in a university medical hospital.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathias Schneeweiss-GleixnerDepartment of Medicine III, Clinical Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Intensive Care Unit 13H1, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0001-5296-1212
Patrick HaselwanterDepartment of Medicine III, Clinical Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Intensive Care Unit 13H1, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Bruno SchneeweissDepartment of Medicine III, Clinical Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Intensive Care Unit 13H1, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christian ZaunerDepartment of Medicine III, Clinical Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Intensive Care Unit 13H1, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Marlene Riedl-WewalkaDepartment of Medicine III, Clinical Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Intensive Care Unit 13H1, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a potentially life-threatening complication in malnourished (critically ill) patients. The presence of various accepted RFS definitions and the inclusion of heterogeneous patient populations in the literature has led to discrepancies in reported incidence rates in patients requiring treatment at an intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a prospective observational study from 2010 to 2013 to assess the RFS incidence and clinical characteristics among medical ICU patients at a large tertiary center. RFS was defined as a decrease of more than 0.16 mmol/L serum phosphate to values below 0.65 mmol/L within seven days after the start of medical nutrition therapy or pre-existing serum phosphate levels below 0.65 mmol/L. Overall, 195 medical patients admitted to the ICU were included. RFS was recorded in 92 patients (47.18%). The presence of RFS indicated significantly altered phosphate and potassium levels and was accompanied by significantly more electrolyte substitutions (phosphate, potassium, and magnesium). No differences in fluid balance, energy delivery, and insulin requirements were detected. The presence of RFS had no impact on ICU length of stay and ICU mortality. Screening for RFS using simple diagnostic criteria based on serum phosphate levels identified critically ill patients with an increased demand for electrolyte substitutions. Therefore, stringent monitoring of electrolyte levels is indicated to prevent life-threatening complications.

Indexed as

HypophosphatemiaNutrition TherapyRefeeding SyndromeCritical IllnessElectrolytesHumansPhosphatesPotassiumProspective StudiesElectrolytesPhosphatesPotassiumcritical carehypophosphatemiaICUnutritionrefeeding syndrome

Identifiers

PMID38612956
PMCPMC11013904
OpenAlexW4393082161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.