ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
The Cellular Respiration of Endometrial Biopsies from Patients with Various Forms of Endometriosis.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The endometriosis-adenomyosis spectrum: shared pathophysiology and microenvironment-driven disease divergence.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Review
- Aberrant mitochondria in endometriosis: From pathogenic mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities.iScience · 2026Review
- Glycolytic reprogramming in endometriosis: molecular mechanisms, immune modulation, and non-hormonal therapeutic opportunities.BMC women's health · 2026Review
- SIRT7 drives energy metabolic shifts in endometriosis via interaction with TUFM and Rhoa/Rock/Akt pathway activation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- The role of purinergic P2X3 receptors and endometriosis-associated hyperalgesia.Purinergic signalling · 2025Review
- Balancing Decidualization, Autophagy, and Cellular Senescence for Reproductive Success in Endometriosis Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Warburg-like Metabolic Reprogramming in Endometriosis: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Approaches.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Endometriosis is one of the leading pathologies of the reproductive system of women of fertile age, which shows changes in cell metabolism in the lesions. We conducted a study of the cellular respiration according to the polarography and the mRNA content of the main metabolic proteins using qRT-PCR of intraoperative endometrial biopsies from patients in the control group and with different localizations of endometriosis (adenomyosis, endometrioma, pelvic peritoneum). In biopsy samples of patients with endometriomas and pelvic peritoneum endometriotic lesions, the rate of oxygen absorption was significantly reduced, and, moreover, in the extragenital case, there was a shift to succinate utilization. The mRNA content of the cytochrome c, cytochrome c oxidase, and ATP synthase was also reduced, but hexokinase HK2 as well as pyruvate kinase were significantly higher than in the control. These oxidative phosphorylation and gene expression profiles suggest the Warburg effect and a shift in metabolism toward glycolysis. For adenomyosis, on the contrary, cellular respiration was significantly higher than in the control group due to the terminal region of the respiratory chain, ATP synthase, and its mRNA was increased as well. These data allow us to suggest that the therapeutic strategies of endometriosis based on modulation energy metabolism should take lesion localization into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.