Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38612368›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

The Nutritional Value of Biowaste Bovine Slaughterhouse Meals for Monogastric Species Feeding: The Guinea Pig as an Animal Model.

Doris Chirinos-Peinado, Jorge Castro-Bedriñana, Patricia Álvaro-Ordoñez, Rolando Quispe-Ramos, Edgar García-Olarte, Elva Ríos-Ríos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Doris Chirinos-PeinadoNutritional Food Safety Research Center, Faculty of Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12000, Peru.
Jorge Castro-BedriñanaNutritional Food Safety Research Center, Faculty of Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12000, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-4312-6917
Patricia Álvaro-OrdoñezSpecialized Institute, Faculty of Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12000, Peru.
Rolando Quispe-RamosSpecialized Institute, Faculty of Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12000, Peru.
Edgar García-OlarteSpecialized Institute, Faculty of Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12000, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-1643-288X
Elva Ríos-RíosScience Faculty, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima 15024, Peru.

Funding

Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú Canon funds on mining canon and royalties, Resolution No. 2254-R-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biowaste from slaughterhouses can be recovered to benefit food security and reduce contamination potential. More than 3 billion heads of livestock are consumed worldwide, which will increase by 17% by 2028, generating more biowaste, increasing infectious agents, and causing economic losses due to circular economy principles not being applied. This work evaluated the nutritional quality of four types of biowaste from bovine slaughter which were transformed into a meal for guinea pigs (rumen content (RCM), ears (EaM), blood (BM), and cheeks (CM)) according to their chemical composition, digestible components, energy contribution, and voluntary consumption. For the animal model, adult male guinea pigs were arranged in metabolic cages for feces collection without urinary contamination. Nine guinea pigs were used in each digestibility test. First, a direct digestibility test was conducted using a meal of barley as a reference diet (RD), the indigestibility coefficient of which allowed for the estimation of the digestibility of biowaste meals through indirect calculations; for this, diets composed of 80% of the RD and 20% of the corresponding biowaste meals were evaluated. The difference method was suitable for determining the digestibility of beef biowaste using the indigestibility coefficients of the reference diet to calculate the digestibility of ingredients which could not be offered as 100% of the meal but were incorporated as 20%. The digestible protein and metabolizable energy contents of RCM, EaM, BM, and CM were 10.2% and 2853 kcal/kg, 44.5% and 3325 kcal/kg, 70.7% and 2583 kcal/kg, and 80.8% and 3386 kcal/kg, respectively. The CM and BM feeds had the highest contributions of digestible protein due to their higher nitrogen content, and the CM and EaM feeds had the highest ME contents due to their higher fat contents. The biowaste meal consumption in descending order was CM > RCM > EaM > BM, which were consumed without problems. These results are indicative that these components can be part of guinea pigs' diets, and it is recommended to continue studies into guinea pig growth and fattening diets with different levels of these biowaste meals.

Indexed as

biowastebovine bloodbovine cheeksbovine earsdigestibilityguinea pigsmetabolizable energyruminal content

Identifiers

PMID38612368
PMCPMC11011187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.