ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Mitigation of Gas Porosity in Additive Manufacturing Using Experimental Data Analysis and Mechanistic Modeling.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulation of ultrasonic atomization behavior and preparation of low-melting-point alloy powders.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- A Brief Review on Biomimetics 3D Printing Design.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancements in In-Situ Monitoring Technologies for Detecting Process-Induced Defects in the Directed Energy Deposition Process: A Comprehensive Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Recent Progress in Computational and Data Sciences for Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fatigue Strength Improvement of Laser-Directed Energy Deposition 316L Stainless Steel with In Situ Ultrasonic Rolling by Preliminary Investigation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shielding gas, metal vapors, and gases trapped inside powders during atomization can result in gas porosity, which is known to degrade the fatigue strength and tensile properties of components made by laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Post-processing and trial-and-error adjustment of processing conditions to reduce porosity are time-consuming and expensive. Here, we combined mechanistic modeling and experimental data analysis and proposed an easy-to-use, verifiable, dimensionless gas porosity index to mitigate pore formation. The results from the mechanistic model were rigorously tested against independent experimental data. It was found that the index can accurately predict the occurrence of porosity for commonly used alloys, including stainless steel 316, Ti-6Al-4V, Inconel 718, and AlSi10Mg, with an accuracy of 92%. In addition, experimental data showed that the amount of pores increased at a higher value of the index. Among the four alloys, AlSi10Mg was found to be the most susceptible to gas porosity, for which the value of the gas porosity index can be 5 to 10 times higher than those for the other alloys. Based on the results, a gas porosity map was constructed that can be used in practice for selecting appropriate sets of process variables to mitigate gas porosity without the need for empirical testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.