ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Operating Properties of Deep Hole Boring Tools with Modified Design.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vibration Characteristics Analysis of Boring Bar with Tunable Dynamic Vibration Absorber.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents the results of research work on the revised design of a deep hole boring tool. The study was divided into three stages: theoretical, experimental and operational. In the theoretical part, a 3D model of the actual boring bar was created, which was subjected to strength tests using the Finite Element Method (FEM), and then prototypes of new deep hole boring tools were made with structural modifications to the shank part of the tool. For the polymer concrete core of a shank, there was a 14.59% lower displacement, and for the rubber-doped polymer concrete (SBR-styrene butadiene rubber) core of a shank there was a 4.84% lower displacement in comparison to the original boring bar. In the experimental part of the study, the original boring bar and the prototypes were subjected to experimental modal analysis and static analysis tests to compare dynamic and static properties. In the operational part of the study, boring tests were carried out for various workpiece materials, during which the basic parameters of the surface geometric structure (SGS), such as roughness Ra and Rz, were studied. Despite the promising preliminary results of the theoretical and experimental studies, using the described modifications to the boring bar is not recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.