Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38611986›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparison between Two Different Synthesis Methods of Strontium-Doped Hydroxyapatite Designed for Osteoporotic Bone Restoration.

Cosmin Iulian Codrea, Daniel Lincu, Irina Atkinson, Daniela C Culita, Alexa-Maria Croitoru, Georgiana Dolete, Roxana Trusca, Bogdan Stefan Vasile, Miruna Silvia Stan, Denisa Ficai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cosmin Iulian CodreaFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3681-4084
Daniel LincuFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0527-0793
Irina AtkinsonDepartment of Oxide Compounds and Materials Science, Institute of Physical Chemistry "Ilie Murgulescu" of the Romanian Academy, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.
Daniela C CulitaDepartment of Oxide Compounds and Materials Science, Institute of Physical Chemistry "Ilie Murgulescu" of the Romanian Academy, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9289-5443
Alexa-Maria CroitoruFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Georgiana DoleteFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9924-1987
Roxana TruscaFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan Stefan VasileFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2267-6453
Miruna Silvia StanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91-95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6273-8540
Denisa FicaiFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1243-6904
Anton FicaiFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1777-0525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of efficient controlled local release of drugs that prevent systemic side effects is a challenge for anti-osteoporotic treatments. Research for new bone-regeneration materials is of high importance. Strontium (Sr) is known as an anti-resorptive and anabolic agent useful in treating osteoporosis. In this study, we compared two different types of synthesis used for obtaining nano hydroxyapatite (HA) and Sr-containing nano hydroxyapatite (SrHA) for bone tissue engineering. Synthesis of HA and SrHA was performed using co-precipitation and hydrothermal methods. Regardless of the synthesis route for the SrHA, the intended content of Sr was 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 molar %. The chemical, morphological, and biocompatibility properties of HA and SrHA were investigated. Based on our results, it was shown that HA and SrHA exhibited low cytotoxicity and demonstrated toxic behavior only at higher Sr concentrations.

Indexed as

co-precipitationhydrothermalhydroxyapatite nano-powderstrontium

Identifiers

PMID38611986
PMCPMC11012538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.